Archive for November, 2008

Obsessing About “OBSESSION”

Monday, November 17th, 2008 by mswora

It came in the mail, unsolicited and unwanted. Like 90% of my mail. And I was about to pitch it out. Again, like 90% of my mail. But then I noticed the title of the CD in the little square mailer: Obsession. Someone had told me about, and that I should expect to get it, based on the fact that I live, breathe and have an address. A few people minus some of those qualifications may have gotten it, too. And it came at the height of this year's fall election season. Just a coincidence? Maybe.

So I watched it. Not the happiest hour of my life. It wasn't so much what it had that bothered me. I'm not aware that this "documentary" contains any doctored facts or footage. Its what it didn't have. Like some of the things I address in my review and response to Obsession, which you can download at Download Obsession.doc. Basically, its my attempt at formulating an Anabaptist Christian response to terrorism of any kind, religious, economic and more. By "terrorism" I mean any attempt to brainwash and blackmail us into acting a desired way through the use of terror. By that definition, "Obsession" may itself be a form of soft-core terrorism. I'd be interested in knowing what you think.

Pastor Mathew Swora

Emmanuel Mennonite Church

 

DEADLY, POISONOUS……. YEAST?

Thursday, November 13th, 2008 by mswora

 Mark 8: 11The Pharisees came and began to question Jesus. To test him, they asked him for a sign from heaven. 12He sighed deeply and said, "Why does this generation ask for a miraculous sign? I tell you the truth, no sign will be given to it." 13Then he left them, got back into the boat and crossed to the other side.  14The disciples had forgotten to bring bread, except for one loaf they had with them in the boat. 15"Be careful," Jesus warned them. "Watch out for the yeast of the Pharisees and that of Herod." 16They discussed this with one another and said, "It is because we have no bread."  17Aware of their discussion, Jesus asked them: "Why are you talking about having no bread? Do you still not see or understand? Are your hearts hardened? 18Do you have eyes but fail to see, and ears but fail to hear? And don't you remember? 19When I broke the five loaves for the five thousand, how many basketfuls of pieces did you pick up?"      "Twelve," they replied.  20"And when I broke the seven loaves for the four thousand, how many basketfuls of pieces did you pick up?"       They answered, "Seven."  21He said to them, "Do you still not understand?"

“Do you still not understand?” Jesus asks his clueless, befuddled disciples. No, they don't. They don't even understand what the general subject matteris that they are supposed to understand something about.

After all the times I've read this passage, I'm still not sure I do, either.

But I know it has something to do with yeast. And with that my preaching series on the kingdom of God in Mark's Gospel ends, for now, where it began: on the subject of really small things that can have very big impacts. One is the mustard seed of faith, or the mustard seed of the Kingdom of God, at least when it enters our world and our lives. The other is the yeast of the Pharisees and of Herod. Understanding what this yeast is seems to be pretty important to Jesus. So check out last Sunday's message (Nov. 9, 2008) at Emmanuel Mennonite Church, at Download poisonous_yeast.doc  to see if I have this right or not.

Pastor Mathew Swora

AN EXERCISE IN FRUSTRATION

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008 by mswora

Mark 6: 47When evening came, the boat was in the middle of the lake, and he was alone on land. 48He saw the disciples straining at the oars, because the wind was against them. About the fourth watch of the night he went out to them, walking on the lake. He was about to pass by them, 49but when they saw him walking on the lake, they thought he was a ghost. They cried out, 50because they all saw him and were terrified.  Immediately he spoke to them and said, "Take courage! It is I. Don't be afraid." 51Then he climbed into the boat with them, and the wind died down. They were completely amazed, 52for they had not understood about the loaves; their hearts were hardened.

In today's Gospel passage we see some very frustrated disciples, rowing like mad one dark night against a very frustrating headwind. What must make it even more frustrating is that they're doing exactly what Jesus told them to do: to get in the boat and row back to Bethsaida, Peter's home town. If this is what they're supposed to do, what Jesus wants them to do, if its the will of God, then why in the heavens is it so infuriatingly hard? Why doesn't the Maker of heaven and earth, the Lord of land, water and sky, whose will is that we be out here doing this, do something about this frustratingly stiff headwind? We're supposed to go somewhere, and we're barely holding our place!

Then, toward the latest hours of the night, and the wee hours of the morning, after muscles are aching and hands are cramping from so many hours of rowing into the wind, Jesus shows up, walking on the water, gets in the boat, and the winds die down.

But its not a trick. Its not a divine dog-and-pony show to show off his power as greater than theirs. Like all the other miracles Jesus does, its a demonstration of the nature of the Kingdom of God. Its also a deeper revelation of his own nature and identity. And its a lesson for the disciples about their calling and ministry, something they'll have to remember later on, after Pentecost, when Jesus is present with them, everywhere, in the Holy Spirit, and not just in Galilee, in a body.  What lesson that was, I try to get at in my message from Sunday, October 26, which you can access at Download walking_on_water.doc

WHY I ENDORSED NO PARTY, NO CANDIDATE

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008 by mswora

November 4, 2008. A group of fifty-plus pastors recently made news when they threw down the gauntlet before the Internal Revenue Service and delivered to their congregations endorsements of a presidential candidate and a political party. I haven't gone on to their websites to see just who they recommended from the pulpit. To me, that's beside the point.

The point is that such recommendations are not what the pulpit is for. At least not the one which God and the church I serve have entrusted me. I hope I never forget what that pulpit is for, every time I stand up there with the authority granted me by God and the congregation. The congregation includes people who are Republicans, Democrats and independents for reasons that I understand and respect. It also includes some people who will not vote at all, never have and never will, again, for consistent reasons of faith that I understand and respect. All of them have called me to be pastor to all of them.

I am responsible to them, and to God, for everything I say from the pulpit. Eternally so. I had better be very careful, therefore, about what I say there, and not abuse that right and responsibility.

Our faith is about God and the kingdom of God. Both of those subjects are much wider and deeper than any political candidate or party or platform can ever be. It should be of no surprise, then, when one party, candidate or platform corresponds with the kingdom of God in some issues and areas, but ignores it or betrays it in another. Nor should it be any surprise when their opposing candidates, parties or platforms pick up on other aspects of the kingdom of God that their competitors ignore. That makes voting- who to vote for and even whether to vote—a dilemma for any citizen whose primary allegiance is to the kingdom of God.

Nor should it be any surprise when one citizen of God's kingdom is drawn more to one candidate or party than another, because of their proximity to kingdom values they hold most dear, while another disciple is drawn to another candidate or party because of their proximity to other kingdom values they hold equally dear. And yet their kingdom values are nearly identical, when seen in the whole. For me to tell one fellow citizen of God's kingdom that his or her candidate, party, or vote are wrong because they are different from mine, is not only to elevate my set of pressing kingdom priorities over theirs, it is to challenge their maturity and sincerity as disciples of Jesus. I had better save my authority to do that for those very rare occasions when it is obvious that someone is flouting and violating their baptismal vows to Christ and the church. Unless my Christian brother or sister is actively espousing the platform and candidacy of, let's say, a white supremacist or an Islamic jihadist, I don't think our differences between political parties, or candidates qualify as differences over which I am going to take my Christian brother to task, not even indirectly, by an endorsement from the pulpit.

Even if my preferred candidate should win, that is not where my victory lies. Or if my preferred candidates and party loses, that does not make me a victim. And if I should find and endorse a candidate whose policies and platforms conform to 90% of my faith-based beliefs, how do I know that this candidate, once elected, will not violate and betray his promises and policies? How do I know that he or she will not fall, through pride, to the original temptation of Adam and grasp at powers and titles that belong only to God? Then what becomes of my endorsement from the pulpit? How would I answer to God for aiding and abetting that recurrent tragedy of hubris and fall? It is literally the oldest story in the world.

But I won't run that risk as long as I only endorse Jesus as king of our lives and our world. He has already proven himself beyond the tempter's grasp.

But that doesn't mean that the pulpit is entirely non-political. If I have the politics of God's kingdom right, then there should be enough in my preaching about love, life and peace to make politicians of all stripes and parties concerned. I preach a kingdom which will outlast and replace all the regimes, parties and nations of the world. While the kingdoms of the world organize themselves around a shared identity that they are for, and enemies that they are against, I preach a kingdom whose only enemy is enmity, whose loyalty oath erodes and supercedes all other loyalties. Wherever and whenever there is any element of idolatry in any political party, platform or candidacy, the preaching of the kingdom of God will necessarily be political.

Whatever the results of today's election, I will pray for the winners, that they might resist the tempter's offer and humbly serve the common good. I will also pray for the church, that we might model that heavenly kingdom which alone will endure after our worldly ones have gone the way of all flesh. And I will pray for myself, that my ministry ad conduct will be pleasing to earth's rightful king. His is the only endorsement I care about. His kingdom is the only one I will unreservedly endorse.

Pastor Mathew Swora