Archive for March, 2008

SO, WHERE IS THIS ‘KINGDOM OF GOD?’

Monday, March 31st, 2008 by mswora

("If the buzzard still won’t eat grass?")

A certain question has haunted me ever since it was first put to me, some twenty years ago. It was put to me by Abdias Coulibaly, the pastor of the Mennonite Church of Orodara, in Burkina Faso, who visited us at Emmanuel Mennonite Church in March of 2006. He put it to me while I was visiting with him one afternoon in his bookstore while we lived there in Burkina Faso. I was talking with him about a new Jula language translation of Mark’s gospel that some linguists were working on in the nearby city of Bobo-Dioulasso.

Although this new translation of Mark’s gospel reflected quite well the Jula spoken in the streets of Bobo-Dioulasso and Orodara and much of northern Ivory Coast, I had a major theological problem with it. I barely got into Mark chapter one, verse 15, and found Jesus quoted as saying, “The time has come; God is king, repent and believe the good news.”

Now, most of your Bible translations, if they’re anything other than a paraphrase, translate Jesus’ first recorded message as, “The time has come; the kingdom of God has drawn near, repent and believe the good news.”

Here were my problems with that particular translation, that "God is king," instead of "the kingdom of God has drawn near": For one thing, it leaves hanging the phrase, "the time has come." The time has come for what? God has always been, and ever will be, king. But more importantly, the phrase “God is king” says nothing new or revolutionary in that society, not for Christians, Muslims or traditionalists. Its even something of a stock phrase used in daily speech, in songs and in sermons in Jula down at the mosque. There are even proverbs like, "God is king; therefore the buzzard will never eat grass." In other words, Don’t expect the world to never change much from the way it is. Because God made it so. But Jesus’ first message, that "the kingdom of God has drawn near," says quite the opposite. Get ready for major regime change.

So, when I told Abdias about my concerns over this new translation, he asked me, “Well, what would you prefer?”

That “The kingdom of God has drawn near,” I said.

“But that will leave people wondering just where is the kingdom of God, if it has indeed drawn near,” Abdias said. “People here may take it literally. Is it as near as the border with Mali, fifty kilometers to the west? Or a little further away, like the border with Ivory Coast, 70 kilometers to the south? If Jesus preached that God’s kingdom has come, but things don’t look all that different, then where is this kingdom of God, and how can we tell that it is near?” he asked.

In other words, what difference does Jesus’ central message make, if, after he preached it and lived it, the buzzard will still never eat grass, and the world continues on as it did before? I highly respect Pastor Abdias and his insight into both the Bible and his culture. As a cultural and linguistic consultant for me, and as a brother in Christ, he saved my hide a number of times as I tried to learn the ropes there. And he posed a very important and perceptive question.

How would you answer it? Here’s my attempt, twenty years later, as we take up again the theme of the Kingdom of God in Mark’s Gospel, at Download KingdomofGod1.doc .

In Christ,

Mathew Swora, pastor

THE SPIRITUAL EQUIVALENT OF A LIGHTNING BOLT

Monday, March 24th, 2008 by mswora

If the people you hang out with, and the effect you leave upon them, tells us something about yourself, then what does Mary Magdalene and her role as "apostle to the apostles" tell us about Jesus. That’s what I attempt to get at in this meditation for Easter Sunday, 2008, at Download Easter2008.doc .

He is Risen!

Mathew Swora, pastor

“In Memory of Her”–A Maundy Thursday Meditation

Thursday, March 20th, 2008 by mswora

Mark 14: 1Now the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread were only two days away, and the chief priests and the teachers of the law were looking for some sly way to arrest Jesus and kill him. 2"But not during the Feast," they said, "or the people may riot."  3While he was in Bethany, reclining at the table in the home of a man known as Simon the Leper, a woman came with an alabaster jar of very expensive perfume, made of pure nard. She broke the jar and poured the perfume on his head.  4Some of those present were saying indignantly to one another, "Why this waste of perfume? 5It could have been sold for more than a year’s wages[a] and the money given to the poor." And they rebuked her harshly.  6"Leave her alone," said Jesus. "Why are you bothering her? She has done a beautiful thing to me. 7The poor you will always have with you, and you can help them any time you want. But you will not always have me. 8She did what she could. She poured perfume on my body beforehand to prepare for my burial. 9I tell you the truth, wherever the gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her." 10Then Judas Iscariot, one of the Twelve, went to the chief priests to betray Jesus to them. 11They were delighted to hear this and promised to give him money. So he watched for an opportunity to hand him over.

Jesus told me what to talk about tonight. Not that I had a vision of him or heard his voice telling me what to say. I didn’t. I’m simply going on his instructions, that “wherever the gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her.” You have entrusted me to preach the gospel, so I should talk about this woman and what she did from time to time, as part of preaching the gospel.

And I have spoken about her, more than once, in this church. As I don’t remember exactly what I said back then, hopefully I’ll come up with something new. Those of you who remember, let me know if I did. Or not.

The gospel comes to us as a story, a story about God and humanity meeting in Jesus of Nazareth. Including, in Jesus on a cross. This story affects us like a stone dropped in the water: it leaves a widening ring of ripples. Where they stop we can’t say, and we probably shouldn’t. This part of the gospel story, about the woman anointing Jesus, leaves some ripples in my life that deal with hope. But more about that in a minute, if I remember. I hope.

Why did she do what she did? That’s what some of the apostles asked, but in a mean-spirited manner, as in, “Why this waste of expensive perfume? The money could have been given to the poor.” But since Jesus put the kabosh on that kind of question, that’s not what I mean when I ask, “Why did she do it?”

At the time, anointing with precious, aromatic oil could have meant at least three things: 1) an extravagant gesture of hospitality toward an honored, esteemed guest, as in Psalm 23, “you have anointed my head with oil.” So as long as the guest lingers, and wherever the guest goes, as long as the perfumed oil persists, you’ll just know by the smell that he is an honored, highly esteemed guest, deemed worthy of such extravagant luxury; 2) anointing with aromatic oil is for the installation of a king (the word “Christ” means “anointed one,” or “king”); the act of anointing and embalming a dead body, out of respect, or to combat the smell of decay.

That last one, anointing a body for burial, is the one which Jesus ascribes to her actions. If that’s what she had in mind, then her action was very perceptive. Here are these monstrous forces gathering around the Christ, seeking to destroy him, and the disciples seem clueless and in denial about it, all the way up to the moment of his death, it seems. But not Jesus, nor this woman. If she intended to anoint him for burial, then she was very perceptive and honest.

Or maybe she meant to anoint him as king. How’s that for ironic? Because it was up to the high priest to anoint Israel’s kings. But we know what he’s up to. Israel’s promised king is anointed by a woman un-named in all the gospels but one: John identifies her as Mary of Bethany, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. If Christ’s kingship is what she meant to convey, then her action is very political, and its courageous. Its political because certainly Jesus’ enemies will see it that way. Its courageous because, when they come for him, they won’t stop with him.

But whether she intended to anoint Jesus for burial, or to express his value and honor as a guest, her action is one of love. Or if she intended this to be his one and only anointing as her rightful king, then her action is one of great faith. And to the extent that she had to overcome fear of being identified with Jesus the peaceful rebel, and to overcome any despair over the sheer size and power of Jesus’ opposition, and the tiny size and relative unimportance of her actions, then what she did was also an expression of hope. Hope against all apparently justifiable hopelessness.

And there you have, in her actions, the three most direct ways in which we experience God: in the gifts of faith, hope and love. “The greatest of these is love,” because without love, any hope or faith we have are misguided and destructive.

I want to focus most on the hope implied in her actions. Given the monstrous size and nature of all the forces and people and powers lining up against Jesus, it would have been so easy for this woman to simply stay home and hide in despair. I don’t know what she hoped would happen as a result of her anointing Jesus. Probably not a popular uprising that would sweep away their common enemies. But she must have decided that, whatever happens, whether Jesus lives only another day or another week, it would still be worthwhile to express her love for him, and her faith in him, even if only because its the right thing to do, whatever the consequence. Hers is but the slimmest margin of hope, at least for anything in this world or in this life. But compared to what they’re up against, she has displayed hope of the highest order.

She reminds me of two Jewish women hiding out during the Nazi occupation of Russia, living in the forests near Minsk with the partisans. They were captured one day by a German military patrol. Their captors threw them into a prison for interrogation, hoping to find out from them where other Jews and partisans might be found. That night they were served a weak excuse of a soup, that had a few pieces of fat floating in it. One of the women took out the fat, wrapped it in her handkerchief, and began polishing her shoes with it.

“What are you doing that for?” her fellow prisoner asked?

The woman replied, “Like my father always said, take care of the little things you can handle, and don’t despair over the big things that you can’t. Polishing my shoes is the one thing I can do right now, and it makes me feel better, for the moment at least. Besides, I am not going to appear before the interrogation officer tomorrow looking like a hobo with dirty, scuffed-up shoes. Whatever happens, he’ll know, as soon as he sees me, that he’s dealing with someone who has some self-respect and care for herself, even if he doesn’t.” So the other woman did the same thing with the pieces of fat floating in her broth.

The next morning they were brought before an officer for interrogation, who looked them over, head to foot, and told the soldier who had brought them in, “I thought you fools knew that our enemies live in the forest, they’re constantly on the run, and its not long before they look that way. But you can tell just by looking at their shiny new shoes that these women are not partisans or rebels. Let them go and bring me some real resistance members.”

That is a picture of the hope that often motivates and sustains our efforts for God, goodness and the gospel. Its hard to say what a particular action or ministry will accomplish today, tomorrow or in the short run. At times, the acts of discipleship we are called upon to do must seem like spitting onto a raging forest fire, or an attempt to empty the ocean with a teaspoon. But since they seem to be the right thing to do, we do them anyway. At least in the hope that God will know and remember, and that one day “we will reap what we sow,” even though we don’t know what the harvest will look like. I know I’m preaching to the choir here when I talk about such hope. If we let the stubbornness and the size of the opposition and the obstacles we face affect our response to things like hunger, war, or the worship of idols, we wouldn’t be so involved with Ten Thousand Villages, Christian education, the Relief Sale, Urban Ventures or our other ministry connections. There would not be the gracious acts of care and support for each other as we have experienced them of late. If we let the small size of our congregation and of our resources determine our enthusiasm or our hope for affecting any of these things, I dare say we would all have stayed home tonight, and every Sunday morning.

In spite of all the darkness gathering around them, this woman does the one and only thing she can do: she ministers to the Body of Christ. And she does so compassionately, generously, extravagantly, even artistically, with a flair and a flourish for one of our most powerful senses, the sense of smell. And that is the one thing surely and always before us, today and every day: the opportunity to minister to the Body of Christ today, the people gathered here and around the world this night, to commemorate Christ and this woman who ministered to him. All our worshiop, prayers and ministries come down to this, ministering to Christ through the people we are given to love and to serve.

That is how this woman’s story affects me. Her slim margin of hope was enough to make her do something that will always be remembered, which will always bear fruit, which will always inspire others, which did make a difference. For that particular moment, yes, but also for now and forever and whenever and wherever the gospel is preached. Her part of the gospel story gives us all hope that even the littlest, most fleeting and momentary things we do for Christ and his body are worthwhile, that they are enduring, and that they will be remembered and rewarded. Indeed, they are their own rewards.

WHO IS THIS MAN?

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 by mswora

So Bible scholarship has finally come down to……seances? Visions of, and interviews with, the dead? That’s what you’d think from reading or hearing the words of Sylvia Browne, a psychic, whose books on religion, the afterlife and, now Jesus, are based pretty much, as far as I can tell, on the authority of her claims to have spoken with the departed and thus clear up many mysteries of history. But she’s part of a bigger picture, one in which the currently and culturally admirable parts of Jesus are claimed, even while his claims to absolute and ultimate authority are not. Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code is another example of this.

To be fair, some of this is actually a scandal over the church and it’s claims to Jesus’ authority. The abuse of Christ’s name for things like the Inquisition, the Conquest of the Americas, the Crusades, and more current revelations of clergy sex abuse in many denominations helped set us up for new and competing claims of ultimate spiritual authority by psychics and novelists.

So do we eschew all claims to truth, authority and belief? That would be only to cede the ground to other claims of truth, authority and belief. The challenge before us is to be as bold about Jesus as he was, while being equally as humble about ourselves. How do we do that? Check out last Sunday’s message at Emmanuel Mennonite Church (March 16, 2008) for Palm Sunday, at Download palm_sunday_08.doc and let me know if I hit the balance, or the symbiosis, of humility about ourselves and boldness about Christ. Or not.

Mathew Swora, pastor

Emmanuel Mennonite Church

WHAT PART OF “CRUEL AND UNUSUAL” DON’T WE UNDERSTAND?

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 by mswora

Mark 15: 16The soldiers led Jesus away into the palace (that is, the Praetorium) and called together the whole company of soldiers. 17They put a purple robe on him, then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on him. 18And they began to call out to him, "Hail, king of the Jews!" 19Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. 20And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.

Holy Week and this year’s season of Lent are a time when Scripture and current events overlap, especially in the matter of torture. Whatever we may say about the theological and salvific nature of Christ’s death on the cross, we must also acknowledge that what He suffered, from the moment of His arrest, was torture. Christ died for our sins. And He died by state-sanctioned torture. The passion narratives make up major chunks of the Gospels even if the events only took up a few days in Christ’s thirty-year life among us. One reason for that is that the first generations of Christians would read or hear them knowing that they very well could face much the same trials, and would be called to stand faithfully by their confession as did Jesus.

Its pretty much an open secret that torture is now a weapon in the arsenal of our country’s "War on Terror." But now its called, "Enhaced Interrogation Techniques." I am not in any position to evaluate the efficacy of "enhanced interrogation techniques," although the rationales and scenarios used to justify it strike me as a very long logical stretch. As a human being however, I can and must say something about the moral depravity of torture as an action or a policy, and about its terrible physical, emotional and spiritual effects for the victims. Survivors of torture describe life afterward as a process of "trying to put the soul back into the body."

And as a pastor and a Christian, I can and must say something about the moral and spiritual effects of torture upon all of us, even of its presence and permission, whether we should ever find ourselves being tortured (slim chance, I hope) or not. As a character in George Orwell’s 1984 admitted, "The object of torture is torture." In other words, gathering vital information by the only means (allegedly) possible is not just a rationale or objective for torture; it serves as permission, a cover, a fig leaf for the brutality in people that finds expression in, among other things, torture. The ends and effects of torture are: 1) the sense of power derived from cruelty and domination over others; 2) the intimidation into obedience of both enemies and citizens through the overt and implied threat of torture; 3) the cheapening of public values and morals, so that independent and responsible citizens become obedient subjects, enured to the sufferings of others, and willing to carry out any policy of their government, however reprehensible and illegal. Torture thus becomes a powerful assertion of the state’s or the leader’s ultimate sense of absolute worth, above and beyond the law and the people it is supposed to serve. I can’t think of any other rationales for excusing or engaging in torture.The morally and spiritually contagious effects of torture on the wider society are evident in the growing popularity of "torture porn," the depiction and deployment of torture as a plot device, and for entertainment, in movies, books and television.

On one hand, we might say that the decision of so many governments to take up the power to destroy life as we know it through nuclear weapons makes the decision to justify and employ torture small potatoes. But recent developments around torture, in America at least, represent a political, moral and spiritual sea change. Now there is a claim to the right to act above and beyond the law (military, federal, state and local) and against the constitutional guarantee against "cruel and unusual punishment" by persons and agencies within the government. How can that not risk cheapening everyone’s respect for the rule of law? Maybe this isn’t all that new, either. Except for the degree of openness and the claims of rightness about it.

As Christians we must resist, as did Jesus, the actions and the effects of torture–or at least the threat thereof–upon all of us. We must not let ourselves be infected by the attitude that inflicting pain is real power, that might makes right and that the end justifies the means. Christ’s life and teachings permit no divorce of ends from means. We must not let the official support of violence and cruelty cheapen our values and corrupt our moral sensitivity. We must not let the implied fear of torture, which, though aimed at enemies, can’t help but frighten citizens, render us silent, passive and discouraged.

On one hand, I am very much surprised that I now live in a country that reserves the right to torture, without ever having emigrated. Especially one whose founding documents so eloquently enshrine the rule of law and human dignity. On the other hand, I should not be surprised at what human nature cooks up and justifies. But every day, when I pray, "Create in me a clean heart, and renew a right spirit within me (Ps. 51)," I trust that I am reinforcing the spiritual fire wall between my spiritual and moral center, and the thickening clouds of moral confusion in the world around us. But keeping ourselves pure from the spiritually and morally contagious effects of torture is only a start. One way I have pushed back actively is by contributing to Center for Victims of Torture http://www.cvt.org/main.php. I consider the little bit I can give to them an act of atonement for the use of torture in my name, by my country. I wish I could do more.

What do you think?

Mathew Swora, pastor

Emmanuel Mennonite Church