Emmanuel Mennonite Church
Emmanuel Mennonite Church
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Speakers’ Bureau
      • Mathew Swora
      • Philip Friesen
      • Kim Vu Friesen
      • Virgil Wiebe
      • George Sawyer
    • Our Partners
  • Pastor’s Blog
    • For First Time Visitors
    • Messages
    • Bible Reading Program
    • Peace Pages
    • Drama
    • Current Affairs
    • For What Its Worth
  • Christian Education
    • Pre-School (Ages 2-5)
    • Primary (Grades K-2)
    • Middlers (Grades 3-5)
    • Junior Youth (Grades 6-8)
    • High School (Grades 9-12)
    • Adults
  • Media
    • Sermon Archive
    • 3rd Party Content
    • Favorites
    • Links
  • Events
    • Recent Events
  • Contact Us
RSS
Monthly Archives: August 2010

WEEK 12: NUMBERS 3-13; PSALM 12

Posted on August 26, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

In these early chapters of Numbers, we see the organization of the tribes and the priesthood taking shape, reflecting the fact that “God is not a God of chaos, but of harmony (I Cor. 14:35a).” The orderly marching of Israel, organized by tribes, behind the priests and Levites with the Ark of the Covenant, following the divine cloud by day or the pillar of fire by night, would have reinforced, in the hearts and minds of the Canaanites, the fear of the Lord that was to go before them and prepare the way for their coming.

The Apostle Paul, reflecting on the very histories we are reading, wrote: “For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered over the desert. Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did. Do not be idolaters, as some of them were; as it is written: “The people sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in pagan revelry.”We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did—and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died.We should not test the Lord, as some of them did—and were killed by snakes. And do not grumble, as some of them did—and were killed by the destroying angel. These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the fulfillment of the ages has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall! (I Cor. 10: 1-12)

ON TOP OF EVERYTHING ELSE, RACISM TOO?

In Numbers 13, we read that Moses has a “Cushite wife.” Beyond that, she is not named. Cush we usually associate with Ethiopia. Was his wife, Zipporah, whom we first encounter in Exodus, “Cushite?” Moses married her during his sojourn in the Desert of Midian, east of Egypt, so that’s unlikely. Or complicated. Or had Zipporah left and divorced Moses? Or died? Or had he divorced her, or even taken a second wife? That wasn’t technically illegal under Mosaic law, nor unusual for the Patriarchs, but it never went well. By the time of Jesus, both he and his fellow Jews were re-affirming the Edenic ideal of “the two become one flesh.” We don’t know the answers to these questions. But the fact that she was “Cushite” very likely Ethiopian, brought scorn from Moses’ brother and sister. And that brought a harsh response from God. If racism was the problem, all the more ironic that Miriam turned “white” with leprosy. This story may reflect two ideas that were revolutionary at the time: 1) that the Hebrews and fugitives from Egypt were a mixed lot in color and culture, down to the level of their families; and 2) God was declaring himself, in the strongest of terms, opposed to racism.

Categories: Bible Reading Program

DON’T TORCH THAT QURAN!

Posted on August 21, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

THOUGHTS ABOUT “INTERNATIONAL BURN THE Q’URAN DAY” AND RELATED AFFAIRS

Though I’m Christian, not Muslim, I am just as distressed at the idea of the proposed “International Burn the Quran Day” as I would be if it were “International Burn the Bible Day.” But that’s precisely what Pastor Terry Jones and his church, the Dove World Outreach Center, of Gainesville, Florida, have proposed as a way of observing the next September 11, 2010, the ninth anniversary of the terrorist attacks (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS5AuRgeoAE): burning copies of the Quran.

I’ve studied the Quran (or at least an English translation of it) and my supreme loyalty is still to the Bible. Yet I offer the Q’uran respect similar to what I offer my Muslim friends, just as most of them respect me and my Bible. This seems a fair and reasonable exchange. If Pastor Jones and the Dove Outreach Center wish to help people come to know Christ, as is his stated goal (mine too), will they gain a fair hearing by such a threatening and provocative act of flagrant disrespect? Or is his a magical world in which he expects respect, but he doesn’t have to give it?

In his interview on CNN, Pastor Jones recites a litany of charges against Islam, such as forced conversions, terrorism and lack of freedom. I’ve also heard Muslims recite litanies of historic grievances against Christians, going back to the Crusades and to old and contemporary forms of Western colonialism. Their reasoning is so similar, they must either both be right, or equally mistaken. To me, Al Qaeda is to Islam as the Ku Klux Klan is to Christianity. Both appeal to one religion or the other, and both are perversions of it. So, just as I would not want myself and my sacred scriptures discredited by association with the Ku Klux Klan, we must make the same distinctions when relating to all who call themselves Muslim. I know, love and respect all the many Muslims in my life. And I haven’t met an Al Qaeda jihadi yet.

I’d like to take Pastor Jones to meet some of my Muslim friends, including the Muslim family in West Africa that effectively “adopted” Becky, our daughters and myself, without requiring us to become Muslim. They even said we could host prayer meetings or a church on their property. That may not be as unusual as Jones thinks.

So, count me as a conscientious objector to International Burn the Quran Day on September 11, 2010. We have, as a nation, more and better grieving to do about the events of that tragic day, nine years ago, if we are to break out of the cycle of victimhood, vengeance and violence. The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the burning of the Quran are part and parcel of our entrapment in aborted and misdirected grieving. Doing something as vindictive and disrespectful as burning the Quran, in order to poke Muslims in the eye, the vast majority of whom had nothing to do with the events of that day, will lead to no one’s healing, including our own. Quite the opposite. Respect and reconciliation will go much farther toward healing the wounds of September 11, which were felt just as strongly in the Muslim community of America, as among non-Muslims.

Similar errors and attitudes are at work over plans for a newer, larger Islamic center in Lower Manhattan, near the site of the World Trade Towers attack. My thoughts: outside of the people of Manhattan and their elected and appointed city officials, its no one else’s business. There may be reasons related to zoning laws and civil safety codes that would argue for or against it, same as if a church were proposed for that site. Religion (or which one), however, should not be a deciding matter in the case, unless we want to start a precedent of legalized religious preference and persecution. We Mennonites should be familiar with where that leads. Our experience has taught us instead that the Holy Spirit has more powerful means of convicting and convincing people than what human laws and regulations can ever provide.

More importantly, what does it say about us that a proposed mosque has become a major national election year issue? Besides fear of Muslims and Islam, it also indicates ignorance. There are already thousands of Muslims living, working and worshiping in Lower Manhattan, with plenty of mosques there even now. Furthermore, the imam and potential builder of the proposed Islamic Center is a Sufi Muslim. Sufism is the most peaceful and universalistic sect of Islam, the one least likely to inspire, recruit and send forth armed jihadists and suicide bombers. In fact, Sufis are more regularly targeted for persecution, violence and murder by Al Qaeda types than are Christians and Westerners, at least by number of successful attacks and body counts.

It all comes down to this: Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Wiccan freedom of religion (and atheist freedom from religion) is our freedom of religion as well. Respect for Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Pagans and atheists is tied up with our respect as well. Respect does not mean agreement, nor is it to be confused with postmodern relativism, the belief that all beliefs are equally true, that they all lead to the same destination. They aren’t, and they don’t. To say otherwise is not even respectful to any religion and its adherents. But respect is indispensable to a Christ-like way and witness in the world. In this fearful post-9-11 age, it could even distinguish us.

Pastor Mathew Swora

Categories: Current Affairs

WEEK 11 OF OUR BIBLE-READING PROGRAM: Leviticus 20-Numbers 2; Psalm 11

Posted on August 18, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

MORE THOUGHTS ON THE HOLINESS CODE

Grace and Law: “The law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1: 17). “The law brings wrath…..but the promise comes through Jesus Christ” (Romans 4: 14-16). That’s as Dispensational as I get. But there are significant connections between the law of Moses and the grace of Jesus that are vital to the understanding of each one. Each dispensation is necessary to our understanding of the other. The law served, among other purposes, to protect the identity of the Covenant People for the coming of the Messiah. That meant that holiness had to protected from moral, physical and spiritual defilement in the world lest sin, shame, uncleanness and defilement take on contagious lives of their own. Jesus, by contrast, operated on the faith that God’s holiness would overcome sin, shame and uncleanness through the contagious life of the Holy Spirit. This we see in many of his healings and interactions with others. The woman with the issue of blood for 18 years (Luke 8:43-46) was legally unclean when she touched Jesus, and so would Jesus have been considered unclean for her having touched him. Yet he commended her for her faith, instead of reprimanding her for “defiling” him. Grace means that the health, healing and holiness (all cognates of the same word) in Jesus overcame the world’s sin and defilement, instead of vice versa.

So it was with the quadriplegic man on his mat (Mark 2:1-12), whom Jesus healed. He and others who cleaned up the bodily issues over which he had no control would have been considered unclean according to the Levitical laws. That would have included the four men who carried him on a cot to Jesus. Again, Jesus commended their faith, rather than chewing them out for ritual impurity. “Your sins are forgiven” could also be taken to mean, “You just got from me the release from defilement that you would previously have had to get through sacrifice at the Temple.”

The purity laws consigned the Gentiles to a state of perpetual ritual uncleanness, and yet Jesus related to them graciously, affirming and encouraging whatever steps of faith they took toward him. This led to Peter’s visit under the roof of a Roman officer, Cornelius, and to Cornelius’ faith in Christ (Acts 10).

Its not that the holiness code was bad or unnecessary. We must come to terms with the contagious power of sin, shame and moral, spiritual defilement. We cannot appreciate nor understand salvation from something we don’t take seriously. But Christian faith also means that our faith is in God and in his power to forgive, cleanse and accept us, and not in our own power to keep ourselves pure by our own observance. Christian faith means that our trust in God’s power to overcome our sin, separation and uncleanness is greater than our fear of sin, separation and uncleanness.

Old Testament Law VS. Canaanite Sacralized Sex Some of the Levitical laws might strike the modern reader as unnecessarily prudish and puritanical, such as one prohibiting stairs leading up to the altar, so that “no one may see the nakedness” of the high priest under his robe. There were also prescriptions for uncleanness and purification after menstruation, night time ejaculations of semen, childbirth and sexual activity. If this were because of some sort of pre-Victorian prudishness about bodies and sexuality, then that doesn’t jive with the rest of the Bible. Either Leviticus would have to go, or The Song of Solomon. More likely, these laws served to radically distinguish the worship of Israel’s God from the pagan worship of fertility deities, which may have been marked by sacralized sexual rituals that are probably not worth mentioning here. According to Romans 1: 18ff, that is where the worship of the Creation, rather than the Creator, always eventually leads.

SABBATH AND JUBILEE LAWS

The Bible does not make the distinctions between personal piety and purity, and social justice that modern Western Christians often do. Greed is another form of idolatry, according to Colossians 3:5. To curtail greed and avoid the otherwise inevitable accumulation of wealth, to the increasing oppression and disadvantaging of the poor and vulnerable, God instituted laws of Sabbath, Sabbath years, and Jubilee. Every seven years, the land was to have a year of rest, all debts were to be forgiven and all slaves released. At least as they applied to fellow Israelites. Applying these laws to all non-Israelites around them and among them would have bankrupted the nation. In the seventh year, any foods and fruits that grew of themselves were for the poor and the wild animals to glean. There is some biblical and historic evidence that some Israelites, in some places, did keep these sabbath years, but observance was spotty at best. Every fiftieth year, the land was to be returned to its originally allotted owners, with the exception of homes in walled cities. That, too, was to prevent the accumulation of land in fewer and more powerful hands.

Behind these redistributive social justice laws, and their implications, lay the understanding that God is the landlord, and the source and owner of all wealth derived from the land. “The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you are but aliens and my tenants.” All real estate transactions were understood only to buy time for use and stewardship of the land, and not the land itself. If God’s people did not keep these laws, the land itself would vomit them out into exile (Lev. 20:22), which happened in 586 BC. “Then the land will enjoy its sabbath years all the time that it lies desolate and you are in the country of your enemies; then the land will rest and enjoy its sabbaths. All the time that it lies desolate, the land will have the rest it did not have during the sabbaths you lived in it (Lev. 26:34-35).”

When Jesus began his ministry, he declared himself and God’s kingdom to be the fulfillment of the Jubilee principle. In his inaugural sermon in his hometown synagogue of Nazareth, he quoted the Jubilee language of Isaiah 61, saying:

“The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to preach good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to release the oppressed,
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”

Don’t forget that the Jubilee year began, not with the sounding of the ram’s horn (that came second), but first, with the sacrifice on Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Jesus, the Lamb of God, is God’s announcement of creation’s Jubilee.

The Law and The Death Penalty

Breaking many of the O.T. Laws and much of the Holiness Code could get one killed. Murder, adultery, witchcraft, cursing one’s parents, offering foreign fire on the altar, among others…..all self-destructive acts. This is also foreign to modern sensibilities, although our military adventures and expenditures are the highest ever, and our entertainment media celebrate death for all sorts of minor reasons.

The death sentences of the Law underscore the essential unity between death and sin. Sin involves a dying of the human soul with every expression. God warned that the first sin would lead to death (Gen.2:17). Through the prophet Ezekiel, God again affirmed, “the soul that sins shall die.” The Old Testament has no problems with the right of the Giver of Life to reclaim his gift when its being abused.

When presented with an open-and-shut capital offense, in the case of the woman taken in adultery (John 8: 1-12). Jesus did not argue with either the crime nor the punishment. He raised a question about who should enforce it. Because all those gathered with stones for the execution were themselves sinners, not a one was qualified to carry it out, lest no one but Jesus leave the place alive.

The Law convicts us all of sin and its intrinsic, organic death sentence. It was logical and necessary that a society under Law exercise God’s judgment. But once started, where would it stop? Grace offers us release and remediation of our lives (Titus 2:11). Under grace there is neither necessity nor reward for exercising the judgment that belongs only to God. So Jesus himself, the Judge and sinless Lamb of God, refused to carry out the death sentence on the woman in question, and instead offered her a second chance. Or third, fourth, however many were needed. Too bad her partner in crime didn’t show up to seek grace, too. Maybe he was there among the men holding stones. All the citizens of God’s kingdom are “the chief of sinners (I Timothy 2:15)” and the repentant and redeemed. I personally think this invalidates even the death penalty in the wider society.

Categories: Bible Reading Program

AT THE END OF THE PARADE

Posted on August 16, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

I Cor. 4:6Now, brothers, I have applied these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, “Do not go beyond what is written.” Then you will not take pride in one man over against another. 7For who makes you different from anyone else? What do you have that you did not receive? And if you did receive it, why do you boast as though you did not?  8Already you have all you want! Already you have become rich! You have become kings—and that without us! How I wish that you really had become kings so that we might be kings with you! 9For it seems to me that God has put us apostles on display at the end of the procession, like men condemned to die in the arena. We have been made a spectacle to the whole universe, to angels as well as to men. 10We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored! 11To this very hour we go hungry and thirsty, we are in rags, we are brutally treated, we are homeless. 12We work hard with our own hands. When we are cursed, we bless; when we are persecuted, we endure it; 13when we are slandered, we answer kindly. Up to this moment we have become the scum of the earth, the refuse of the world.  14I am not writing this to shame you, but to warn you, as my dear children. 15Even though you have ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel. 16Therefore I urge you to imitate me. 17For this reason I am sending to you Timothy, my son whom I love, who is faithful in the Lord. He will remind you of my way of life in Christ Jesus, which agrees with what I teach everywhere in every church.  18Some of you have become arrogant, as if I were not coming to you. 19But I will come to you very soon, if the Lord is willing, and then I will find out not only how these arrogant people are talking, but what power they have. 20For the kingdom of God is not a matter of talk but of power. 21What do you prefer? Shall I come to you with a whip, or in love and with a gentle spirit?

Any among us who have recently been to Rome just missed an opportunity to experience the following spectacle: to hear the bold, brash blare of trumpets, the stirring roll of drums, the rhythmic tread of marching feet and the deep clop-clop of horses’ hooves, the fluttering of broad scarlet banners with the golden eagle emblem, to the wild cheering of the crowds as through a special gate opened only for such occasions, the Porta Triumphalis, the army of a triumphant general or emperor, returning victoriously from war, marched up the street called La Via Triumphalis with his soldiers, his captives and his loot. Where the likes of Julius Caesar, Pompey and Marcus Aurelius rode their chariots, with laurel wreaths around their heads, at the front of their victorious and surviving soldiers, cars and buses now sit in the sweltering heat of summer traffic jams. Or people sit at sidewalk cafes cooling down with a cup of gelato, on that same street now called La Via del Forii Imperiali. (Sound familiar to anyone?) Anyone who was there recently just missed such a spectacle by only 2,000 years at most.

That is the scene that Paul the Apostle had in mind when he told the Corinthian Christians,.”..God has put us apostles on display at the end of the procession, like men condemned to die in the arena. We have been made a spectacle to the whole universe, to angels as well as to men. We are fools for Christ…We are weak…..we are dishonored!” Paul puts himself, and the other apostles, on the ancient Via Triumphalis, or today’s Via del Forii Imperiali in Rome. Except for the cars, the buses and the gelato of course. Paul and the other apostles are in the triumphal procession of a general’s victory parade. Only you’ll find them near the end of the parade, among the captured enemy soldiers, hands tied, feet chained, naked or clad in rags, marched off to the Coliseum to face wild beasts and gladiators, unarmed, to die for the entertainment of the masses. But the masses need not wait to take their seats in the Coliseum. Its perfectly permissible for them to jeer, taunt, curse and pelt the prisoners with rocks and waste from their garbage cans. Or their chamber pots. In fact, it would be taken as a show of public spirit, patriotism and good citizenship to do so. In the parade of worldly, imperial life, that, Paul says, is where God’s agents should be prepared to find themselves.

If these are brutal things to say or to contemplate, then we’ve just tasted the sting of the whip that Paul says he might bring when he visits the Corinthian churches, if they don’t take his warning and do an attitude check. When he concludes this section by asking, “What do you prefer? Shall I come to you with a whip, or in love and with a gentle spirit?” don’t think of a real cowhide whip, like what cowboys might use on horses or cattle. Think of the confrontational images, words and questions that Paul has just used to shake up and wake up the Corinthian Christians from their arrogant dreams of pride, and their desire for strength, status and wealth in the world.

Since arrogance, pride, envy and lusting for power and prestige are common to the human condition, in both the church and the world, we’re never done needing a sting of the occasional reality check to confront us and to interrogate us with some pretty basic questions from time to time. So as we ponder this passage, take note of three things it contains: 1) a confrontation; 2) an interrogation: and 3) an invitation.

As for (one) the confrontation, that’s in the apostle’s image of the Triumphal Entry, the wrong end of it, that is. I felt something of a similar confrontation this week when I heard the tragic news of the ten aid workers, most of them Christians, who were killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan, for the alleged crime of evangelizing. One of them, Glenn Lapp, there with Mennonite Central Committee, was known to several of our own members and attendees. They weren’t evangelizing, and they had always served notice that they wouldn’t. But to the Taliban, just being a Christian, or in league with a Christian, is tantamount to evangelizing, a crime, under Islamic law, worthy of death. And in a way, they’re right. Not the death sentence part. But the actions and the conduct of those aid workers were evangelistic, in that they represented Jesus quite faithfully, even without them uttering a single evangelistic word. And that put them at the end of the Taliban’s victory parade, as targets of dishonor and death.

Their deaths, like Paul’s words, confronted me with some pretty basic questions, like: Why am I a Christian? Is it to garner the respect and admiration of polite society? That may have worked in the 1950′s, when church growth in America was nothing short of amazing, when church membership was part and parcel of postwar middle class, upwardly mobile, loyal American respectability, along with the new suburban home, poodle skirts and bobby socks, and the big car with tail fins. It was not unusual– even legal back then– for employers to ask potential employees during job interviews if they attended church and if so, which one. Such respect gave the pastor and the priest automatic access and success. So we got invited to pray over sessions of city hall and the commissioning of new nuclear submarines.

I think that many American Christians miss those days of triumphal Civil American Religion, and long for them back. But that was an odd, unusual and temporary moment in all of global church history. And they are long gone, especially now, when increasingly, almost any statements of Christian belief and moral boundaries are confused with bigotry, or labeled as much.

It seems from Paul’s words that such respect and respectability vis a vis their society is what some among the Corinthian Christians were striving for. In polite Greek society of the time, what was religion for, anyway, but to cultivate success and social access? That led people, as Paul put it, “to boast in one [apostle] over another.” Or to consider themselves different, wealthy, strong, honored, even kings and royalty…already. Or at least to put on such airs and appearances.

While this kind of social striving is normal, it is devastating to the church. We’re called to be God’s showpiece to the world of the coming class-free jubilee kingdom, in which the first shall be last and the last shall be first, no one will have too much and no one too little. The Corinthian arrogance and lust for honor and respectability led some of them to play fast and loose with Christian doctrine and with Christian ethics. Its why some of them taught that there was no physical resurrection, neither for Jesus nor for us, as we saw in Chapter 15. Because that would be scandalous in polite Greek society. Its why some people were porking out at their communion services/love feasts while the poor members just looked on, to leave hungrier than when they came, as we saw in Chapter 11. Because it was not chic in polite Greek society to share food and tables with slaves and the poor.

Before Paul could set them straight on matters of Christian belief and behavior, he had to confront this arrogance and social striving. “You can boast all you like in your apostle versus someone else’s,” he’s saying, “but notice where we apostles are in life’s parade: the very place you fear most, at the end of society’s Triumphal procession, not the head. So we work with our hands; we go hungry and thirsty, in ragged clothes; considered the scum of the earth and the refuse of the world; we are persecuted but we endure it, cursed, but we bless; a spectacle to heaven and earth.”

Confrontational words these are, with all the subtlety of a cracking whip. But notice the questions they imply (and this is my second point, the interrogation part): Questions like, Just why did we become Christians in the first place? Whose approval and acceptance count most to us? Whose honor and esteem were we seeking when we were baptized? That of the world, so that we might march at the head of society’s parade? What did we expect as a result of our confession of faith in the Crucified Jesus, some sort of victory parade?

Actually, our victory parade is coming. We can count on it. And even on being at the head of it, with the victor’s crown, or laurel wreath. For as Paul told the Roman Christians, “We are more than conquerors, through him who loved us.” That the Corinthians wanted to be at the front of the Victory Parade was not all bad. They just had their timing wrong. And the wrong sponsors. And with this I come to the third part of this message, the invitation.

Paul does invite us all to a victory parade, a triumphal procession, for Jesus, for himself and for us, when he says, in verse 8, “Already you are kings, and that without us. How I wish that you really had become kings so that we might be kings with you!” Because there will come a day when we and the apostles and all of Christ’s followers will be crowned and revealed for the royalty we really and already are. Christ himself is heaven’s king, come as a servant, to share our humble human condition. The good news today is that Christ conquered not people but sin and death, so as to lift us up, exalt us and make of us a nation of priests and kings like himself. When he returns, that will be his triumphant parade. And ours as well. You are invited to the head of that parade.

But Christ’s example also shows there are no shortcuts to the head of the parade. He was willing to put in his time at the end of the procession, dragging a cross among the jeering, taunting crowds. So were the apostles. So were the ten aid workers killed in Afghanistan.

And so must we. Will we accept the invitation in this passage to join Christ and the apostles there as well, at the end of the procession, as the potential target of the world’s contempt and dishonor?

As hard and difficult as that sounds, the end of the line turns out actually to be a place of great freedom. Remove from our calculation the desire and the cost of public approval and it will be easier to do what Jesus would do. Such as when Shane Claiborne, the speaker at last month’s youth conference, and his friends camped out with homeless families who found shelter in an abandoned cathedral in Philadelphia. They did so in order to stand in solidarity with the homeless, and to help focus resources from the wider community on them. Society expects little else, and hardly even notices when poor people and people of color end up on the streets. But when college-educated young adults from middle class homes get evicted with them, people of their class, family and background are more likely to see human beings among the people and families huddling over ventilation grates on cold winter nights. For this act of solidarity with people at the end of life’s parade, City Hall and the Archdiocese made threatening moves to arrest and evict them all. So did the Fire Marshall, who claimed that the cathedral was a fire trap. His coming inspection would prove that, he said. But Claiborne and his friends stayed, effectively taking their place at the end of society’s parade.

But they weren’t alone. Friends joined them there. The night before the Fire Marshall came, fire fighters showed up to install smoke detectors, fire extinguishers and other equipment, free of charge, so that the abandoned sanctuary would pass inspection for human habitation. And it did, much to everyone’s surprise, joy and relief.

So the end of the parade turned out to be not such a bad place, after all. In fact, it became a place of partying, with lots of friends. The fact that most of them were homeless and poor didn’t detract from anyone’s joy. In fact, the end of the parade was where God showed up with riches and resources, in the form of friends and free smoke detectors and fire extinguishers.

By contrast, the front of the parade, where the conquering general rides alone, is a lonely, solitary place. He had his chariot to himself, although some accounts say that he was accompanied by a slave who held an umbrella over him, to shade him from the hot sun. This slave was also said to whisper repeatedly in the conqueror’s ear, “Remember that you are mortal.” All the more proof that sometimes being at the head of the parade is over-rated.

Unless its Jesus’ victory parade, where we will be immortal. Will we join him there, by declaring and maintaining our loyalty and love for him, even though it might mean marching in the back with him, among the prisoners, the poor and the despised? Will we free ourselves of the need to be respected by the world, and stand with Christ whenever the world heaps contempt on him, and all he stands for? If so, then we can count on his promise, that “Whoever confesses me before men will I confess before my Father.” When that day comes, at that moment, he will be at the head of the parade. So will those who stood with him. And who walked with him, at the end of the procession.

Categories: Messages

“THESE SHALL BE CLEAN…..THESE UNCLEAN” Week 10 of our Bible Reading Schedule

Posted on August 12, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

LEVITICUS 10-20; PSALM 10

In the next eleven chapters of Leviticus (10-20), the modern reader is likely to find mysterious, baffling, and maybe even tiresome the lengthy and detailed passages of purity regulations, often called “The Holiness Code.” The Christian reader will have at least two questions: 1) why are there such purity regulations around animals, food, clothing, bodily functions and issues (including sex and death)? And 2) what of this applies to us today, as Christians?

The second question first: These regulations do not apply to Christians. And they do. They do not apply in detail, but they say something to us in their spirit. In fact, the Apostle Paul warns us that if we seek to obey them, especially in order to justify ourselves to God, then we will have put our salvation in jeopardy. “You who are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.” (Gal. 5:4). The Orthodox and observant Jewish rabbi, Jesus of Nazareth, turned his Orthodox and observant disciples in a new (but old) direction regarding the purity regulations by saying “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man ‘unclean.’ For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.” (Matthew 15: 17-19). In so saying, Jesus moved us toward freedom from all the sacrificial and purity regulations, while upholding the truest, deepest meaning of purity, morally and spiritually speaking. Murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander, and more are also addressed by the Law of Moses.

To grasp his point, we must make the distinctions that Jewish rabbis have always made, back to and before Jesus, between the ceremonial/ritual law, the civic law, and the moral law. The latter, such as the Greatest Commandment (To love God and neighbor, Ex. 3: 6 and Lev. 19:18), and the Ten Commandments, apply in any time, culture, place or people. To them we are bound, for the well-being of our souls. Disobeying them does not disqualify us from salvation, but it could, if persistent and willful, “shipwreck our souls”(I Timothy 1:19). These distinctions are not always easy to make. Among the minute details of the holiness code we also find statements of deep and universal moral and spiritual reach, especially Leviticus 19: 18: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” So don’t be too quick to skim over the Holiness Code and dismiss it all as quaint or irrelevant. Sometimes even the seemingly oddest ceremonial detail expresses some universal truth.

Still, the civic and ceremonial laws, such as what we’re reading now in Leviticus, existed in a time and place, as the Rabbi Saul of Tarsus (the Apostle Paul) put it, “when we were children” (Galatians 4: 3). Then, “we were in slavery under the basic principles of the world. But when the time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons. Because you are sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, the Spirit who calls out, “Abba,Father.” So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, God has made you also an heir.” (Gal. 4:3-7). So the details of these regulations no longer apply to us. Join me, if you wish, in a warm pork brat with sauerkraut, or a shrimp cocktail salad, after giving thanks to God, of course.

But reading and pondering these purity regulations is still of some value to Christians, at least to know the world and the scriptures from which Jesus was operating, and in which the church of the New Testament was working out the relationship between Gentile and Jewish believers. Read them also in order to understand and identify with the universal human concerns that these regulations address: shame, uncleanness, defilement and alienation, often through no fault of our own. As tolerant and accepting as we should try to be of all people and of their weaknesses and troubles, these purity matters are still basic to the fears and feelings that drive and divide us. In Israel’s sacrifices and purity regulations were daily reminders of the defilement, shame and separation that still afflict and estrange us for reasons of moral defilement (as sinners and the sinned-against), or even for worthless reasons of status, appearance, fashion and wealth. In them were also reminders of the grace and acceptance of God, and the cost of which, which would be born by Christ himself, who endured the most shameful of ritual impurities, to die and hang, as a cadaver, on a tree (Deut. 21:23). Christ died for our sin and our shame, to redeem us and to cleanse us. “He became sin, who knew no sin…”

There are other reasons for these laws, and functions which they serve. Check out the 2000 online Journal of Evangelical Theological Studies at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3817/is_200012/ai_n8922535/?tag=content;col1 for a full list of reasons and rationales given. The most convincing to me are: 1) to provide cultural barriers between Israel and her pagan neighbors, in effect, speed bumps against cultural and religious assimilation; and 2) to flesh out aspects of social justice and re-distribution of accumulated wealth; and 3)to reinforce the holiness (“otherness”) of God, of God’s people, and of God’s sanctuary, whether the Tabernacle or the Temple (Lev. 15:31). In the costly shedding of blood to redeem the firstborn sons or even the messes of the most ordinary aspects of life (sex and childbirth), there are reminders of the supreme value of the gift of life, and of the supreme otherness and exaltation of God, the giver of life. Finally, they give visual pictures, in the flesh or on the walls, literally (Lev. 14) of the effects of the greatest and most universal defilement, sin. Think about this a while and see if it doesn’t start to make your breath catch or your spine to tingle. If so, you are beginning to experience something that Dr. Rudolf Otto, early in the 20th Century, called “numenous,” the mysterium tremendum, the tendency to invoke fear and trembling, and mysterium fascinans, the tendency to attract, fascinate and compel. The ancients called it “holy fear,” or “the fear of God..” Reading and thinking about these purity regulations and sacrifices reminds me of the words of the hymn, “Twas grace that taught my heart to fear, and grace my fears relieved.”Life, bounded by such purity regulations, and re-balanced as needed by sacrifices, would have many daily symbolic reminders that “you are my chosen people.” Therefore, “you shall be holy [separate, other] because I am holy.”

Categories: Bible Reading Program
© 2011 Emmanuel Mennonite Church.
725 E. 25th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
Tel: 651-766-9759. Contact Us.
Designed by Boer and Boer  |  Log In