Emmanuel Mennonite Church
Emmanuel Mennonite Church
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Speakers’ Bureau
      • Mathew Swora
      • Philip Friesen
      • Kim Vu Friesen
      • Virgil Wiebe
      • George Sawyer
    • Our Partners
  • Pastor’s Blog
    • For First Time Visitors
    • Messages
    • Bible Reading Program
    • Peace Pages
    • Drama
    • Current Affairs
    • For What Its Worth
  • Christian Education
    • Pre-School (Ages 2-5)
    • Primary (Grades K-2)
    • Middlers (Grades 3-5)
    • Junior Youth (Grades 6-8)
    • High School (Grades 9-12)
    • Adults
  • Media
    • Sermon Archive
    • 3rd Party Content
    • Favorites
    • Links
  • Events
    • Recent Events
  • Contact Us
RSS
Monthly Archives: July 2010

“WHEN YOU OFFER SACRIFICE”–WEEK 9 OF OUR BIBLE READING PROGRAM: Exodus 39-Leviticus 9; Psalm 9

Posted on July 29, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

Up to this point, the modern Bible reader will have waded through many detailed and repetitious passages such as Exodus 36: 20:”They made upright frames of acacia wood for the tabernacle. 21 Each frame was ten cubits long and a cubit and a half wide, 22 with two projections set parallel to each other. They made all the frames of the tabernacle in this way. 23 They made twenty frames for the south side of the tabernacle 24 and made forty silver bases to go under them—two bases for each frame, one under each projection. 25 For the other side….”

From previous passages and commands we already knew how many poles there would be and how big they should be. The same is true of other details relating to the altar and instruments of sacrifice, plus those of the priestly garments. Then we encounter passages like Exodus 38: 21-31, in which we read long lists of the materials given for the tabernacle, the altar and the priestly vestments, and of their value at the time. The modern reader is tempted to skim through these passages, in part because such things no longer exist. So why the long, detailed and repetitive lists of items?

One thing they tell us is that every detail of obedience to God counts. There are no moments, choices, actions or contributions we can make in which we are not reinforcing and stockpiling something that will endure forever in the very shape of our eternal souls. Nothing is wasted nor forgotten in God’s kingdom.

But in such detailed and repetitive prose we are also encountering a stark difference between our contemporary Western culture and that of ancient Israel, indeed, of much of the world still today, especially the non-literate world. Especially, the non-hurried and more reflective part of the world that does not need to hurry up its Bible reading, or any other activity, to get it out of the way before; 1) I have to go to work; 2) John Stewart is on TV; 3) the kids need picking up at school and ferrying to the soccer field; 4) the movie starts at 7PM…….. In other times and places, life is lived more in the moment, without the pressure of tight schedules. So to sit in the synagogue and hear the detailed and repetitive words of this part of the Holy Writ is not only just about the only entertainment in town, the words constitute a form of poetry, even liturgy, in themselves. The repetitious nature makes them all the more accessible to non-literate people who have amazing powers of retention, who need hear such passages only once or twice before they have large chunks of them memorized. They don’t rely on their bookshelves, nor their computers, nor the Internet, to store information for them.

MORE THOUGHTS ON SACRIFICE

Now that we’re into Leviticus, a lot of blood is flowing through the reader’s imagination, the blood of bulls, goats and pigeons on the altar of the Tabernacle. This may seem archaic, at best, for the Christian who understands Christ to be the final, culminating sacrifice. What we now offer up to God are ourselves (Romans 12:1-2) and worship, generosity and hospitality (Hebrews 13: 15-16).

Some of this sacrificial blood in Leviticus is flowing for sins committed in error and ignorance. Part of me says, “Give us a break!” But then I remember that I have been trained by my culture to understand sin in terms of willful, intentional actions (or the lack thereof) that violate a code, creating a rap sheet of incidents. Its called guilt, and it has much biblical precedence. But there’s another angle on sin and estrangement, felt more keenly by much of the world, that understands sin in terms of defilement and uncleanness. Something I did by error or ignorance shouldn’t make me guilty. But in this other worldview, it still makes me unclean. And that leads to shame. I feel guilt for the wrong I’ve done, or the good left undone. One often feels shame for what and how one is, even if that state was foisted upon us by someone else, intentionally or otherwise. For some people in some cultures, something as minor as being licked by a dog, or stepping on camel feces, induces uncleanness and therefore shame. So, many of the sacrifices we read about in Leviticus are for cleansing shame, rather than guilt. And what more precious, costly substance can there be to cleans shame but blood?

“The blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!” Hebrews 9:13-14

Categories: Bible Reading Program

“Then I Will Dwell Among the Israelites”–Week 8 of our Bible Reading Program

Posted on July 28, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

EXODUS 26-36

From the exciting narrative of the plagues and the crossing of the Red Sea, we move to more detailed descriptions of two major features of ancient Israelite life: the priesthood and the Tabernacle, later to be replaced by the Temple. These were understood to be pictures of greater realities in heaven (Hebrews 8:5). Christians understand them to be pictures of a reality to come, with Jesus (Hebrews 8 &9). Its not necessary to go overboard trying to find moral or spiritual lessons or applications for every detail of the Tabernacle or of Aaron’s priestly garments. The most important aspect of the Tabernacle is summed up in Exodus 29: 4 “So I will consecrate the Tent of Meeting and the altar and will consecrate Aaron and his sons to serve me as priests. 45 Then I will dwell among the Israelites and be their God. 46 They will know that I am the LORD their God, who brought them out of Egypt so that I might dwell among them. I am the LORD their God.”

The meaning of the Tabernacle, as a meeting place between God and his people on the move, is also applied to Jesus in John 1:14, “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us,” literally, he “tented” or “tabernacled” among us. Our temple will have to wait for later, the New Jerusalem.

For a picture and diagram of the Tabernacle, check out http://www.bibleplaces.com/tabernacle.htm.

As for the priesthood: “To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, 6and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Father—to him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen.” (Rev. 1:5). So an identity that applied mostly to one tribe of Israel (the Levites) now applies to the worldwide church. For info on the mysterious “urim and thumim,” check out http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=52&letter=U.

CENSUS, PLAGUES AND PURITY:

In Exodus 30: 11-16, we read of a census that is to be taken of the people, for the sake of the tabernacle, with the implication that a plague might break out otherwise. It is a “ransom” of sorts, another reminder that life is a gift for which we owe responsibility back to the Giver. Thbat’s also why all the firstborn males of families and livestock were to be redeemed by sacrifice. In I Samuel 24, we read of a census done by King David, not ordained by God, for the purpose of determining how many men there were who “draw the sword,” in effect, a military census, rather than a religious one. For that, a plague does break out against Israel. A mysterious and disturbing story, perhaps explained, in part, by the fact that David was snatching God’s prerogative for his own egotistical, imperial and military purposes, showing (again) how Caesar claims what is God’s, to the peril and impoverishment of the people, as Samuel warned the people when they clamored for a king. This is one of many biblical reasons to view militarism as a religion, a false, idolatrous one.

A JEALOUS GOD?

Exodus 34:14 “Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.”

The modern reader recoils at the notion of God, especially a God who is Love, feeling and being jealous. That sounds, at first, so petty, reactionary and even juvenile. We associate jealousy with middle school cliques or even toddlers in day care fighting over a toy. But maybe we have it backwards. What is so petty, juvenile and foolish about so much human jealousy is that it is a pale and ridiculous copy of something that belongs only to God, the way worship does. The one exception to our contempt for jealousy is that of a betrayed and abandoned spouse, or a jilted lover, who had every reason to believe that a covenant existed between the lovers. Now he or she sees the one who played with his or her affections in the arms of another lover. That hurts deeply, especially if that new lover is more prosperous and popular than the jilted one. Which would imply that the faithless spouse or lover has had mercenary motives all along. How can he or she ever trust anyone with love again? This is the kind of jealousy to which we normally give some respect. Because someone has taken the effort and the risk to hand his or her heart over to someone else, only to have it handed back, torn by shame and rejection.

This is the kind of jealousy to which God lays claim, for risking his name, his honor, and his heart on those he woos. He has handed those, and every other blessing, over to people who so often spurn, ignore, misuse and abuse such love for temporary, worldly and mercenary motives. Time and again, through Creation, the giving of the Law, through the Prophets, and finally, through the gift of His Son, God has offered himself like a suitor to his would-be bride, Israel and the Church. The story ends well, with the wedding feast of the Lamb at the end of John’s Revelation. But its a rocky, tear-soaked road all the way to the altar. Just read Hosea. Or the Passion narratives of the Gospels. Jealousy, among humans, is the most suspect of all our emotions, but only when we get jealous about the wrong thing, and because jealousy is, finally, God’s prerogative.

Categories: Bible Reading Program

JUDGE….JUDGE NOT

Posted on July 26, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

I Cor. 4: 1So then, men ought to regard us as servants of Christ and as those entrusted with the secret things of God. 2Now it is required that those who have been given a trust must prove faithful. 3I care very little if I am judged by you or by any human court; indeed, I do not even judge myself. 4My conscience is clear, but that does not make me innocent. It is the Lord who judges me. 5Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts. At that time each will receive his praise from God.  6Now, brothers, I have applied these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, “Do not go beyond what is written.” Then you will not take pride in one man over against another.

Purpose: That we will embrace our Christian freedom from judging others, and being judged by others, because it is God who judges.

If I were promising us today freedom from gravity and a foolproof way of personal flight—not in an airplane, not even a jetpack, but by jumping up and flapping our arms—hopefully you’d be very skeptical. But today’s passage promises something like that very kind of freedom. By the time this message is done, I hope we will all understand and embrace its promise of freedom, a freedom even greater than freedom from gravity.

This promise of such great freedom is described in verse 5, when Paul writes, “Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait till the Lord comes.” At first this kind of freedom sounds exactly like what today’s post-modern thinking considers freedom. “Judge nothing:” Doesn’t that fit right in with the contemporary mindset that says there is nothing to judge but judgment and judgmentalism, nothing to disapprove of but disapproval, nothing to disagree with but disagreement, because we’re past thinking that everything is relative. That’s so 1960′s! We’re on to “everything is good” now, except for saying that anything is bad. So we can tolerate everything except intolerance. See, its even in the Bible. Like Paul says, “judge nothing.”

And if you’re wondering, “Who are you and what have you done with the pastor?” you’re probably not alone. And if you’re thinking, Wait a minute, even saying “judge nothing” is passing judgment on something, at least on judging, then you’re a step ahead of the sermon. And if we should go on to say, “But this whole letter of I Corinthians is about judging or discerning between beliefs, behaviors and values, and that Paul himself passes judgment on all sorts of moral and spiritual options,” then good for you– you’ve been paying attention to this sermon series.

So what gives? How can we judge nothing, including the act of judging, according to a letter full of all sorts of moral and spiritual judgments and discernment? Well, it depends on what—or who—we’re judging. And on who’s doing the judging. We read in verse 6 that the Lord does the one supreme historical definitive and 100% accurate judgment when he returns. “He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts. Then each person will receive his praise ….from God.”

For as rarely as we hear sermons on The Last Judgment, it’s a pretty basic feature of Christian faith. Of all prophetic, monotheistic and Abrahamic faiths, like Judaism and Islam too. One of the names given in the Q’uran for God is “Master of the Day of Judgment.” This name is repeated with every one of their five daily prayers. It wouldn’t hurt us Christians either to remind ourselves regularly of that feature of God’s nature, and of our accountability and responsibility.

But what God judges is something that neither you nor I have the capacity to judge: “what is hidden in the darkness [of each human soul] and the motives of people’s hearts.” That’s what is meant by “judge nothing.” Nothing by way of “what is hidden in the darkness [of each human soul] and the motives of people’s hearts.” Paul says that he isn’t even completely capable of doing that for himself. “I do not even judge myself,” he writes in verse 3. “My conscience is clear,” he adds, “but that does not make me innocent. It is the Lord who judges me.” The judgment that counts most will be done by the One who knows us better than we know ourselves, let alone anyone else.

So we must judge and discern among all the alternative values, behaviors and beliefs coming at us all the time, as if our lives depended upon them. For they do. As an example, I know people with histories of crystal meth and ecstasy use, whose brains have been so deeply scrambled that sometimes I don’t know if I’m talking to the person in front of me, or to residues of the chemicals. Maybe they got into that stuff thinking, Hey, its all okay, except for saying that anything is not okay. But as far as I know, they may never be entirely free of the temptation to use again, nor of the effects of the drugs that have abused them. So, we are responsible for for discerning between beliefs, behaviors and values, so that we don’t get into bondage like what I just described. Its not always easy, but its a life-and-death matter. And it is doable.

But judging—or discerning– what Paul calls “what is hidden in darkness” and “the motives of men’s hearts,” that is, judging people themselves, that we are neither capable of, nor responsible for. That is God’s business, not ours. On that day when all is laid bare and we shall know as we are known, we will be surprised by the darkness that was in the lightest and brightest of souls, and the light that was somehow yet there in what seemed to be the darkest and deadest of souls. Or as the little childhood ditty puts it, “There’s so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, it doesn’t behoove any of us, to talk about the rest of us.” So I hold out hope for all people, whatever they’ve done, whatever their past, not because of who or how they are, or who or how I am, but because of who and how God is.

Paul himself, in all the passages we have read so far this year, does not infringe upon God’s realm of judgment. Nowhere in this letter does he judge persons or evaluate their worth the way he does their teachings or their conduct. Their conduct might be just wrong, arrogant, destructive and divisive, and he’ll say so. But never does he label or reject them personally.

But isn’t that what we often do whenever a disagreement rears its head, or a question or controversy arises over some moral or spiritual matter? Such as the controversy in the church or conference over questions of sexuality, or church membership, or war, patriotism and politics? That, in fear and self-defense, we are tempted to go for the jugular vein and to question people’s motives, their character, their value to us, to the world and to God? That we judge not just what they advocate or do, but who they are and what they’re worth? Experience has taught me that no side in any controversy has the monopoly on such fear-based tactics. I’ve seen people who call themselves “non-judgmental” act very judgmentally against people whom they judged for being judgmental.

But two wrongs don’t make a right, nor can we arrive at clarity without charity. We may have one hundred good reasons to believe that a position we hold, or an action we take, is morally superior to all the alternatives. But that gives us no right nor reason to believe that we personally are morally superior than anyone else. Our position might be technically correct, like the computer that kept billing my father one year for an account balance of zero dollars and zero cents. By the third notice, it was threatening to charge interest if he didn’t send in a check for zero dollars and zero cents. It was technically very, very correct. But also lacking something very important. In Christian moral discernment, that most important part is always love for people, even if we can’t always love their beliefs and behavior, judgmental or otherwise. Our first and most important task in discerning right from wrong and good from evil is to love people with a love that is infinitely warmer, even more sacrificial, than what mere tolerance can muster.

We may know this, but sometimes fear and confusion can tip us back into childish or adolescent behavior, like wondering and worrying about who’s most popular, who’s most valued, who’s in, and who’s out? Whenever we uncover a disagreement, that’s the fear that raises its ugly head: I thought I was in, but am I now about to be out?

And that’s what Paul was up against in Corinth: something like high school cliques that never grew up. As we saw in the previous chapters, the churches of Corinth were preoccupied with a vicious, divisive popularity contest. “I am for Paul, I am for Apollos, I am for Peter,” some were saying. Not only is that trying to pit Peter, Paul and Apollos against each other, it obviously got turned inward, among the members. Many of us came out of our junior or senior high school years the walking wounded, wounded by such rejection, cliques, labels and scapegoating. And the trauma may come back, from time to time. Like for the guy who received information in the mail about his upcoming twenty-fifth high school reunion, read it, and found himself on the list of people whose whereabouts were unknown. Go figure.

But all that “Who’s In and Who’s Out and Who’s Who?” seems to have been like water off a duck’s back for Paul. “God judges, and I don’t even judge myself,” he said. He cares about the Corinthian Christians passionately, like the father that he was to them in the faith. But he doesn’t care about what they think of him or how much they like him. Or not. The only one whose judgment he cares about is God’s. And on that day of judgment, when all humanity is gathered before his Great White Throne, his verdict will prove so indisputably right-on and penetrating that “every knee will bow and every tongue confess” that he is Lord. What a relief that neither you nor I nor anyone else we see sits on that Throne.

And that’s the freedom that this passage offers us today. Not any freedom from responsibility for our actions, not any freedom so-called from the responsibility to discern right from wrong, or good from evil, and to order our steps aright. The failure to do so, or to do so correctly, can lead us into less freedom, not more.

Nor is it freedom from God’s judgment. That’s just a given. And I know, at first, that sounds like a recipe for enslavement to fear. To stand before the One who knows me better than I know myself, and to have him reveal all that he see in me, all that I have done and have therefore become….Scary. Because none of us is exactly on the inside what we are on the outside. And we know that.

But really, finally, the one and most important thing we will be judged upon is whether or not we embraced and accepted God’s love, God’s mercy, forgiveness and affirmation for us. As Karl Barth defined it, “Faith is the courage to accept that we are accepted.” By God. That’s what we’ll have to answer most for: Have we let God justify us through his compassion for us, or did we keep trying to justify ourselves to God and to the world by our works? Or did we try to justify ourselves by judging others? Did we rely upon the world and ourselves to judge us, with the usual harsh and punitive standards, or have we let God judge us, with his reliably merciful and compassionate heart? In effect, by that choice, we actually judge ourselves. The one choice is slavery, the other freedom.

If we’re looking for true freedom, then flee to the Judge who is also our Refuge, our Comforter and our Vindicator, and we need never fear either his judgment, nor that of anyone else again. That’s one kind of freedom that today’s passage offers us.

But there’s another kind of freedom offered to us: freedom from the hard work of climbing onto God’s Great White Throne and taking on the task of judging the world for him, of trying to discern what we cannot know about others, sometimes not even about our own mysterious selves. We can confess this: that there will be a supreme, definitive judgment; that God has the last word over human history and our histories. We can name Him who will do the judging: the One sinless lamb of God who took our most damning judgment upon his own back in the form of the cross. And we have heard how he will judge all who have fled to him for mercy. As he himself said, “No one who comes to me will I cast out (Jn. 6:40).” So, we’re free from the fear of judgment.

But when it comes to other people, even people with whom we disagree on major stuff, even people who may hate us and judge us, we stand at the threshold of a mystery whose depths and darkness only One knows and can judge, and it is not any one of us visible here this morning. We are free from the burden of trying to guess the motives and secrets of their hearts, or to determine their destinies and relationship with God. We can move on then to the first and most important task of discernment for which we are responsible, and of which we are capable: how to order our own lives aright, how to love others and display to them the tender mercies and the extravagant welcome of God.

I had such an experience last January, and it was beautiful. It wasn’t easy, but it stands out as a prime example of the disciple’s freedom that comes from leaving divine judgment in divine hands. It was when our regional district conference held a discussion on biblical interpretation and sexuality.

Since this conference was in Iowa, and since it was winter, it seemed the better part of reason to carpool our way down from the Twin Cities. In that van were people all over the map in regards to their understanding of sexuality and the Bible, even including one person in a major role in a major advocacy organization. So you can understand why I was a little nervous getting into that van. Once they knew what a dyed-in-the-wool classical orthodox biblicist I was, were they going to dump me out and leave me in a snowbank along the windy, wintry Interstate? On a cold January day, being in or out could be a life and death matter. But others in that car, with different positions, probably had the same fear about me. And we had ample opportunity during the conference to compare our positions and air our differences.

On the way back home, we stopped at a restaurant in Mason City, Iowa, and enjoyed good food and each other’s company. No one seemed to be holding a grudge, no fear held back the laughter and the witty repartees, and no one’s appetite seemed to be inhibited by having just done the hard and sometimes painful work of finding our way through the moral and spiritual thickets of this world, holding many of the same basic values, but going down different paths. I remember that friendly and enjoyable trip together, on a dark, cold January night, as a supreme example of what can happen when we separate the need to judge moral and spiritual alternatives from trying to judge what only God can judge: people.

I’m so glad that that is God’s task, not mine. That frees us to get on with doing what we discern, and what he reveals, his will to be, free from fear of either God’s rejection and condemnation, or that of anyone else. Free as well, from the burden of doing God’s job of judging others. That’s the freedom I wish for everyone here.

Categories: Messages

STAR–Strategies for Trauma Awareness and Resilience

Posted on July 22, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

A Review: by Mathew Swora

“Seeing your face is as seeing the face of God” (Genesis 33:10), said Jacob to his estranged and offended brother, Esau, upon their reunion. This was long after Jacob had betrayed and despoiled his brother of his birthright and his blessing, and long after his brother had threatened to kill him for that. More than a mere exclamation of relief, these words serve notice that the invisible God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is to be seen in relationships, especially in stages and moments of healing and reconciliation, in effect, through love. For “God is love” (I John 4:8). What began with Cain and Abel, God can and will stop and heal, through such things as what Jacob learned and did. Ours is “The God of Jacob.”

In Jacob and Esau’s story we find all the elements of trauma: betrayal, estrangement, fear, violence, even murder, even fratricide (or at least the threat thereof). Some of these elements may also be found after natural disasters, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and tornadoes, when our previous assumptions about our place and relationship with the world are shattered, sometimes literally out of the blue. All of them can be found in human-generated disasters, such as war, genocide, crime, murder, and civil strife. Just read Lamentations for a catalog of trauma.

Although long-term, unrelieved stress can generate physical and emotional symptoms similar to post-traumatic stress, the normal, unavoidable stress of every day lives and our built-in role conflicts are not to be confused with trauma. Trauma differs from stress similar to the way in which a tornado differs from prevailing winds. In Belgium and in Kansas, I have seen how mature trees lean in the direction of prevailing winds, having constantly been stressed to survive in that shape. But they’re still quite strong, maybe stronger for the pressure. Tornadoes, however, can uproot and shatter trees. When a human or natural disaster strikes so suddenly, powerfully and irreversibly as to threaten our lives and our very sense of being and meaning, as though it were a betrayal of the very covenant we had made with God, life and the world, that is trauma.

In response to trauma, our bodies want to shake, weep, cry out, move, even run, the fight or flight response. There is deep, God-given wisdom to such responses; they discharge adrenaline and other God-given hormones that enable us to react to threat and hopefully even survive. But often we are forced—or feel forced—to stuff and stifle these responses for a later time, or indefinitely. Children who were abused in any way quickly learn not to react, lest they “invite” more abuse. Or people in the midst of falling bombs or rising waters have to shut down their shaking and quaking in order to get to safety. They may never let it come back on, so busy are they with coping and putting the pieces of life back together.

Yet the body remembers, and years later, for reasons we may not understand, they may come out in destructive ways, such as “acting in.” That is, by drug and alcohol abuse, risky sexual behavior, or other destructive addictions. Or we may “act out,” by abusing other people, stirring up conflict or in organized mob violence, as with gangs or in war. While such actions may provide momentary feelings of relief, they also widen the scope of trauma victims and add another kind of trauma to that of the victims: participant-induced trauma, the trauma of guilt, shame and spiritual deadening on the part of the offender. Often people carry both kinds of trauma, because, as is often said in therapeutic circles, “hurt people hurt people.” Violence and trauma become, in effect, a spiritual virus passing from one host to another, through families, communities and even nations in a vicious, self-perpetuating circle. The curse of Cain did not stop with him.

Just as we should never underestimate the power and effects of trauma, so we should never underestimate the power and possibilities of healing. In the STAR training (Strategies for Trauma Awareness and Resilience) that I took over the weekend of June 23-27, I learned much about the causes, effects and treatment of trauma. Though hosted by Augsburg College, in Minneapolis, MN, it is part of Eastern Mennonite University’s Institute for Peacebuilding. Mennonite peace and reconciliation workers have discovered that no one can deal with conflict for very long before realizing that it is often driven and complicated by very deep, emotional and historic pain, in effect, trauma. Rarely can the conflicts be resolved and peace made until the underlying pain and fear are addressed and healed to some degree.

The words “healing” and “treatment” makes it sound like it was a course for licensed therapists and psychologists, but only some of the attendees were of that professional status. The rest of us were students, school teachers, community activists and organizers, seminary students, and one pastor—myself. I would recommend STAR for anyone. The information was accessible and applicable for anyone of almost any educational background and level.

Central to STAR’s model of trauma awareness and response is “the snail model.” Think of the inner, overlapping circles as descriptors of the cycle of trauma/abuse, acting in and/or acting out and re-traumatization, of self and others. This cycle, sadly, is the plot line of many stories, epics and movies, from the ancient Babylonian creation epic, to Homer’s Illiad, Hitler’s Mein Kampf, the spaghetti westerns of Clint Eastwood, to today’s shoot-em-up video games, and the revenge fantasy novels of Dean Koontz. Often, the unwilling participants in this cycle bear a tragic nobility, suffering inevitably as both victims and avengers.

If that is not to continue forever and destroy both victim and perpetrator and create many more, at some point one must break free and create a new, self-reinforcing cycle, or story, or identity, by transcending the cycle of violation and vengeance. Because it breaks out from the tight circle of pain and retribution and moves off in another arc, a diagram of this redemptive movement has been called, “the snail model.” Also because it goes slowly and can be messy, as snails are.

The trajectory of the new cycle begins with truth-telling: exploring and memorializing the story of the injury but with a difference from the constant feedback loop of victimhood and the need to avenge. In the new story, the old plot leads to new ones, in which the victim rises above the status of victim, and the offender is considered separately from the offense. Prime examples of this would be the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C., or the courageous and careful restoration of Warsaw, Poland, brick by brick, after it was completely leveled in 1944. There’s no excusing or minimizing the offense, of course. But the offender has to be re-considered as a hurt human being (because “hurt people hurt people”), no longer diminishing him or her to a sub-human status, as when the Hutus of Rwanda labeled the Tutsis “cockroaches.” That gave permission to stamp them out. But just as often, the offended must take the offender down from the status of a super-human monster, bigger than life, and therefore, above and beyond the reach of conscience, love or healing. This happened in Nazi-occupied Poland, when the war started to turn against the Nazis. Hearing news of German defeats, and seeing wounded Germans in passing hospital trains, gave many Polish Jews and Gentiles courage to start standing up to the occupiers in both overt and covert ways. They were only human, after all.

From there the trauma victim moves toward a new story and identity, one of survivor, overcomer, forgiver and peacemaker. Forgiveness is not to be confused with reconciliation, which requires just as much responsibility on the part of the offender as on the victim. The victim’s own healing cannot be held hostage to the offender’s willingness—or not–to admit his or her wrong-doing and ask for pardon. The offender may not even be available or alive any more. Forgiveness is not about excusing or minimizing the injury. It is about releasing oneself from a felt need to avenge, and therefore re-traumatize oneself and others.

An important way-station in the journey of trauma healing is the willingness to seek reconciliation with the offender. In one of the most touching parts of the seminar, that is what we saw a mother and her granddaughter do, in a documentary film, with the man who had raped and murdered the granddaughter’s mother years before. With the help of a volunteer who worked with Victim-Offender mediation, they were able to meet with the murderer in his prison and hear the answers to many of their questions about the murder. This was possible because of good preparation for this event, which included working with the murderer to help him get to the point where he owned up to what he did, and to all its meaning and ramifications. Forgiveness and reconciliation are not to be confused with condoning what needs to be forgiven. By honestly facing what he had done, and how it had affected them, both the offender and the victim’s survivors experienced some relief from the symptoms of trauma, how it that had long depressed, deadened and imprisoned them. The brutal crime had already forced into fact a relationship between the murderer and the victim’s loved ones. But after their initial meetings, that relationship was on a constructive, life-affirming path for all of them. But the murderer remains in prison.

This cycle of release and healing is the grand, mythic story that must come to inspire, instruct, and re-construct us, as an alternative to the myth of redemptive violence and the cycle of vengeance that has enchanted us for millenia.

All this I have described so far in psychological and therapeutic language. But it is also, I noted, the language and movement of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The break from the self-perpetuating cycle of violence and vengeance into a new self-perpetuating cycle of healing is one that Jesus made even as he was being nailed to the cross, when he prayed, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” On the third day after his crucifixion, he appeared to the very disciples who had abandoned and denied him in his hour of need, an act in their culture that was nearly every bit as bad as his betrayal by Judas and his murder, and said to them, “Peace be with you.” Then he went on, through his disciples, to reach out, incorporate and reconcile people of the very tribes and nations that had abandoned and murdered him (Gentile and Jewish), and to reconcile them to each other. This “ministry of reconciliation,” in the apocalyptic language of John’s Revelation, is “the war of the lamb” (Rev. 17:14).” It is every bit as heroic, mythic and cosmic, and requires just as much courage, discipline and dedication, and then some, as does war. But in this war, bodies, souls and relationships are re-united and healed.

And it is not just for the survivors of war, murder and natural disasters, although one can argue that we are all such survivors, even if only by a few degrees removed. To live and be human is to have to work through offenses, injuries and insults to our selves and our sense of well-being, even if they are self-inflicted or secondary, that is, by hearing the stories of other people’s traumas and helping them through them. Trauma healing is also for social workers, aid workers, medical personnel, pastors and any others who help carry other people’s burdens and may themselves suffer secondary trauma and compassion fatigue.

Much of what we, as helpers, can do for those recovering from trauma, is to listen with patience, attention, care and empathy. In so doing we help them tell their story and thus validate their pain and injury. We cannot reinterpret their story for them, but we can listen for and encourage those steps and twists in the story-telling through which they can begin to move from a cycle of victimhood to one of victory over the symptoms of trauma. Because, by the grace of God, life, hope and healing are ever seeking to enter and re-direct the inward, downward spiral of victimhood. At times, though, we may have to recognize and challenge the temptation to use the story to reinforce a sense of victimhood, rather than to seek a way out of it.

Even if our lives have been incredibly sheltered (like mine, comparatively speaking), in this city (Minneapolis) and in this time, one need only sit somewhere a while before trauma stories and trauma victims come looking for us. Trauma of some sort has driven most of the immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers to our neighborhoods. The Native peoples, whose ancestors received the first Scandinavians and Germans to this community, carry a trauma wound that is re-opening on the occasion of Minnesota’s 150th anniversary. Federal law still says that the Dakota are not supposed to live in this state, under pain of death. I sense that the recent Arizona law requiring the validation of citizenship whenever there is any reason to doubt it, and the recent proposal of such a law in the Minnesota state legislature, has heightened the level of fear in the local Spanish-speaking community, documented and otherwise.

Trauma can feed back to the present from the future, in the one universal trauma we all face: that of death and dying. And so we deny and negate the reality of death in ways similar to the common denial of traumas in our past. But hope and healing can also filter back from the future to the present. On the last day of STAR, our assignment was to bring in some symbol of hope for ourselves. One person brought a cross. A Somali woman quoted a verse from the Q’uran in Arabic. Another brought some of her photography. I brought two matching halves of a freshwater clam shell that I had found alongside the Maumee River, upstream of Toledo, Ohio. It is a sign of healing and hope, I said, because the river, at its headwaters in Fort Wayne, Indiana, begins nearly as a dead zone, so badly is it polluted with silt, sewage and industrial waste. By the time it reaches Defiance, Ohio, however, the river is much cleaner and brimming with life. Freshwater clams are especially sensitive to pollution, but from Defiance on down they thrive in the river nearly all the way to its mouth, near Toledo, so powerful and effective are the powers of healing, renewal and cleansing in this world. That reminded me, I said, of another picture of healing and restoration to come, in John’s Revelation, chapter 22: “Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. No longer will there be any curse.”

And from the previous chapter, verse 4: “God will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away. He who was seated on the throne said, ‘I am making everything new!’”

Categories: Peace Pages

“I AM THE LORD YOUR GOD–” Week 7 of our Bible-Reading Program

Posted on July 21, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

EXODUS 15-25; PSALM 7

I would like to hear from anyone who is following this Bible reading series, and what their thoughts, experiences, insights and questions might be from having read thus far through the Bible with me. Please email me to tell me how its going, and how this site, and these reflections, might better serve and help you.

ANCIENT SUZERAINTY TREATIES AND THEIR RELATION TO THE TORAH.

Because of the discovery of ancient imperial documents in the Middle East, prominent Old Testament scholars in the 1950′s began to note striking similarities between the Covenant of God with Israel, and suzerainty treaties between powerful emperors and empires (Egyptian, Hittite, Assyrian and Babylonian) and weaker, smaller, neighboring vassal states (Edom, Phoenicia, Moab, sometimes Israel and Judah). The suzerain, or powerful patron state or monarch, would claim certain powers over, and loyalty from, the smaller vassal, or client state, especially over foreign affairs of state, like trade, war or peace. In exchange for military protection, certain trade and treaty rights, and some leeway on religious and domestic policies, the suzerain would claim from the vassal state tribute, loyalty, some religious homage, and obedience to certain laws. The consequences for failure on the part of the client state included invasion, destruction, enslavement and even genocide, or at the least, withdrawal of protection from other enemy states. If the suzerain failed to enforce or keep up his or her side of the covenant, that reflected shamefully on him, and constituted an open invitation to neighboring raiders or empires to despoil or annex the client state. The usual features of a suzerainty treaty began with a declaration of the sovereign’s name, and then went on to an historical prologue, in which the suzerain laid out his claim to the vassal’s loyalty, based on his benevolence in the past and his power to protect. Then the terms of the covenant, binding upon both the suzerain and the vassals, were enumerated, followed by lists of consequences for various infractions, ending often with blessings for obedience and curses called down upon treason and traitors.

All these elements are found in our Old Testament readings thus far. The Ten Commandments begin with the words, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt….” Genesis can be read as a very long historical prologue laying out God’s case for his claim to the land and the people whom he will install there. This case culminates with God’s defeat of Pharoah and his armies at the Red Sea, and his liberation of his people. In this week’s readings we begin to read the terms of the treaty, or covenant, by which God will protect and rule his people, in exchange for their tribute, obedience and loyalty. Supreme to this part of the treaty are the Ten Commandments, in Exodus 20. Like most suzerainty treaties, it lays out boundary markers beyond which one shall not pass (“you shall not….”) rather than micro-managing Israel’s conduct with exact stipulations for each situation. The case laws we find in Exodus 21 and beyond are, to some degree, examples that elucidate the broader principles laid out in the Ten Commandment. In Exodus 24 we see the religious and liturgical elements of the treaty beginning to take flesh. In later sections of the Torah or Pentateuch (first five books of the Bible) we will see the consequences of faithfulness and of disobedience in terms of blessings and curses respectively.

But the differences between God’s covenant with Israel and the suzerainty treaties of Israel’s neighbors are also quite instructive. The God of Abraham shows himself to be much more intimately concerned with his subjects’ treatment of each other, personally and individually, than were the Pharoahs or the kings of Assyria or Babylon in respect to their vassal, client states. Their treaters were made from one king to another, whereas The Fear of Isaac is making a covenant with the people of Isaac, not just with their king or priest. For they will be his “holy nation, and a priestly people.” Israel’s Suzerain is much more concerned with the weak, the poor, the orphans, the widows, the slave, the sojourner and the alien than other worldly suzerains ever were. He takes the treatment they receive personally, and reminds the Israelites that “you too were slaves, strangers and aliens” in Egypt.

Another difference was in the degree to which Israel’s God, on the occasions of Israel’s treason and disobedience, would seek to restore the broken trust and relationship, enduring their rebellion long beyond the point where the covenant called for punishment, going again and again the extra mile to call his people back, and doing infinitely more to forgive and to reconcile than any worldly suzerain would ever have done. Human disobedience not only provokes moral and spiritual consequences, it becomes the occasion to highlight God’s tender mercies, God’s patience and God’s power to restore and renew.

ON SACRIFICE: WHY SO MUCH BLOOD?

The attentive reader will notice a lot of blood flowing in our passages so far. Mostly animal blood, through the sacrifices of cattle, sheep and goats, every time a covenant is made or renewed. That startles and disturbs contemporary sensibilities, partly because whatever meat we may eat usually comes packaged in sanitary and bloodless ways, miles removed from the place of slaughter. And few of us have ever cleaned a fish, let alone slaughtered and processed a chicken or a goat (I’ve done the first two of the three, and I’m in no hurry to repeat it).

A common answer is that “without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins (Heb. 9:22).” Thus, the sacrificial animal is either a payment for sin, or his death reminds us of the true nature and price of sin. I find some truth and power in that. But there are other dimensions to sacrifice, which include the symbolically and emotionally unifying act of eating together, as a way of experiencing and affirming the justice and trust between the two parties who have made this covenant, and have celebrated it with something sacrificial. Yes, it was sacrificial to the animal that was slaughtered, but also to the party that raised and owned it. God, as the giver of the land and the livestock, was understood to be present and sharing at the sacrificial feasts that marked the making and the renewing of the covenant.

Another meaning of sacrifice, applicable to both worldly and divine suzerainty treaties, is to give both parties a chance to say, “May this so happen to me should I betray my part of this covenant.” After the Jerusalemites released their slaves in the year of Jubilee, to try and win God’s favor, and then promptly re-enslaved them, God recalled his covenant and said, “The men who have violated my covenant and have not fulfilled the terms of the covenant they made before me, I will treat like the calf they cut in two and then walked between its pieces. The leaders of Judah and Jerusalem, the court officials, the priests and all the people of the land who walked between the pieces of the calf, I will hand over to their enemies who seek their lives. Their dead bodies will become food for the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth. (Jer. 34:16-18).” This should have come as no surprise to them: the regular sacrifices for festivals or for purification would have reminded them of the seriousness of the covenant and of the costs of disobedience.

Categories: Bible Reading Program
Previous Entries
© 2011 Emmanuel Mennonite Church.
725 E. 25th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
Tel: 651-766-9759. Contact Us.
Designed by Boer and Boer  |  Log In