Emmanuel Mennonite Church
Emmanuel Mennonite Church
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Speakers’ Bureau
      • Mathew Swora
      • Philip Friesen
      • Kim Vu Friesen
      • Virgil Wiebe
      • George Sawyer
    • Our Partners
  • Pastor’s Blog
    • For First Time Visitors
    • Messages
    • Bible Reading Program
    • Peace Pages
    • Drama
    • Current Affairs
    • For What It’s Worth
  • Christian Education
    • Pre-School (Ages 2-5)
    • Primary (Grades K-2)
    • Middlers (Grades 3-5)
    • Junior Youth (Grades 6-8)
    • High School (Grades 9-12)
    • Adults
  • Media
    • Sermon Archive
    • 3rd Party Content
    • Favorites
    • Links
  • Events
    • Calender
    • Recent Events
  • Contact Us
RSS
Monthly Archives: June 2010

“IN THE BEGINNING….”

Posted on June 11, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

….of our new congregational two-year Bible reading program, we will start with Genesis chapters 1-11 and Psalm 1 for the first week (June 14-20).  The first chapters of each book (Genesis and Psalms) introduce us to the power of God’s Word, to create and to re-create. Genesis is the seed bed of the rest of the Bible. Get the basic assertions down in the first three chapters and you’ll be on track throughout the rest of the Bible, assertions such as:

  • God creates, and all power to create comes ultimately from God
  • God creates in a peaceful, orderly and harmonious way, by means of his word (as opposed to the violent and chaotic ways that the gods of Egypt and Babylon brought the world into being)
  • The material world that God creates is good (Gen. 1)
  • While it is good (not perfect, or it would be another God), and while God loves and delights in it, the world is not God. Genesis 1 challenges the pantheism that blends the Creator with Creation, as well as the indifference and inattention to Creation that the Deism of Thomas Jefferson holds.
  • Humans occupy a place of dignity within this good creation, as God’s vice-regents and the bearers of his image (Gen. 1: 26-28). But we are still a part of God’s Creation, not apart from it.
  • Both male and female members of humanity are equal and necessary to bearing the image of God in the world (as opposed to the “image of God” residing only in the emperor or the royal family)
  • While science is necessary for understanding the world, the Word introduces us to the world in the language of a worship. The language of Genesis 1 is that of a worship litany, not a science textbook.
  • The Creator wants harmony and relationship with us (Gen. 3:8).
  • Evil and disorder in the world are not necessary and equal parts of creation, ever destined to be in tension with goodness and harmony, but are the result of a fall, an ongoing moral catastrophe.
  • God is addressing the fall of creation and its moral source, with a promise of ultimate victory through” the woman’s offspring” (Gen. 3:15). Christians see in that a 2-fold promise, that God and goodness will have the last word, and that this last word is Jesus.

We get off track when we forget that creation is good, that nature is not God, that both men and women and their mutual, equal and harmonious relationships reflect the image of God, or that God has the last, and triumphant, word over evil and disorder.

In the chapters that follow, we’ll see how evil and disorder unpack themselves in creation, such as through violence (Cain and Abel), polygamy, machismo and mysoginy (Lamech, Gen. 4: 19-24), and empire (Babel, ch. 11). But we’ll also see how God works to restrain evil and chaos, such as through Noah;s Ark, and to give us symbols and reminders along the way of his faithfulness and his eventual triumph, as in the rainbow.

Psalm 1, like Genesis 1, is a rhythmic litany about the power of the word to create, or re-create, the image of God in us. In it we see similar themes of fruitfulness and harmony, with a warning, like that in Genesis 2, against disobedience.

To further explore the connections between creation, peace and the word of God, check out:

  • Dr. Walter Wink on the history, current and ancient, of “The Myth of Redemptive Violence,” which Genesis 1-2 seems to challenge and suvert: http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/cpt/article_060823wink.shtml
  • Ted Grimsrud (Eastern Mennonite University) on Creation and peace: http://peacetheology.net/the-bible-on-peace/02-gods-creative-love%E2%80%94genesis-1/
  • an inspiring and artistic rendering of Genesis 1 on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEgp2_Rcc80

I welcome your questions and comments to any of the thoughts above, and about the passages covered so briefly in this post.

God bless you and your reading, that as you meditate on the law of the Lord,  you may be “like a tree planted by streams of water.”

Pastor Mathew Swora

Categories: Bible Reading Program

THAT THERE BE NO DIVISIONS

Posted on June 8, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

I Corinthians 12: 14Now the body is not made up of one part but of many. 15If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 16And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be part of the body. 17If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be? 18But in fact God has arranged the parts in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be. 19If they were all one part, where would the body be? 20As it is, there are many parts, but one body.  21The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” 22On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, 23and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. And the parts that are unpresentable are treated with special modesty, 24while our presentable parts need no special treatment. But God has combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, 25so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. 26If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.  27Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it. 28And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues. 29Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? 31But eagerly desire the greater gifts.

I owe the main point of today’s message to a theologian I heard recently, when he spoke at a local seminary. He’s Justo Gonzalez, a Cuban Methodist pastor and theologian, who served many years as a teacher and leader of a seminary in San Juan, Puerto Rico. I heard Dr. Gonzalez speak about the very passage we just heard this morning. In his talk, he told about a big ecumenical celebration at the seminary, when representatives from all the Christian denominations of Puerto Rico came together for worship, and to celebrate their unity in Christ. As he read verses 22-25, it was all he could do to keep himself from laughing out loud as an oddball and slightly irreverent idea struck him. Here he was reading this passage about giving special honor to the weaker parts of the body, about how we protect and even dress up the most vulnerable and least presentable parts of the body, and listening to this were all these cardinals, bishops and arch-bishops, metropolitans and reverends and Right-Reverends, in their gold-brocaded robes and pointy hats, with their ornate, golden crosses and shepherds’ staves. Even lowly pastors and conference ministers of low church denominations were wearing robes and stoles and big, golden crosses on their chests. In the midst of this glamorous ecumenical fashion show, it was all he could do to keep himself from interrupting the Bible reading to laugh and to ask, “Is that why we’re all decked out like this and have these grand, honorific titles like Father, Right Reverend and Your Holiness? Because we the clergy are actually the weakest and least presentable parts of the body of Christ?”

I’ll let you decide on your own answer to that question.

In today’s passage, Paul draws our attention to the different treatment that we give to different parts of our own bodies. Its all one body, but it doesn’t all get the same treatment, decoration or coverage. Construction workers don’t wear their work boots on their ears, just as the Minnesota Vikings don’t take the field wearing athletic supporters on their elbows. Of course that’s not equal treatment for the body parts. But its necessary and strategic. Without getting too graphic, suffice it to say that our particularly tender, vulnerable and private parts get the most protection and care, because they need it.

Dr. Gonzalez went on to say that this ironic twist, that we give the most honor, protection, covering and even decoration to the weakest, most private and least presentable parts of the body, is the very hinge on which this passage turns, on which it turns even in a surprising new direction. Its a new idea about their relationships that he most wants the Corinthians to get their minds around. Its where their customary body talk has suddenly jumped the rails and gone in another direction.

Up until verses 22-25, while Paul compares the church to the human body, he is not telling the Corinthians anything they had never heard before. Comparing a community to a human body was common to the day and time, whether that community was a family, a city, a country or even the empire. But it was usually used to explain why the emperor was the emperor, why the middle class was in the middle, and why the slaves were slaves. Because, supposedly, the gods had so arranged the parts and pieces of “the body politic” to serve the directions of the head, just as the liver, the lungs and the heart serve by the signals of the brain. That was the conventional wisdom of Greek and Roman society in the First Century: how and why everyone was arranged in order of status and power, from top to bottom, so that the strongest and most presentable parts of the community body got the most honor, decoration, power and protection.

The whole focus and orientation of this kind of “body politic” was the person at the pinnacle of power. In that kind of arrangement, the weaker parts of the body politic, like slaves, soldiers, women, Jews and unskilled free men and women, were quite dispensable, and easily abused or neglected.

And not much has changed. Inequality of power, wealth and opportunity are growing around the world, with disastrous results for health, peace and happiness. Just around the corner from us this morning, on 24th Street, between Park and Chicago Avenues, are two starkly different symbols of how we organize ourselves in response to human weakness and need. One is Hope Academy, a faith-based school that serves inner city children, many of whom are at risk and in need. Next to it, in the grounds of the Eye Hospital, is an abortion clinic. As much as that saddens me, I’m not recommending we go march over to the abortion clinic and block the doors. At that point and place, I think its too late to do something about abortion. Every so often, I see protesters from both sides of the issue out there in a tense stand-off, and their relationships—or lack thereof– make me sad. Its like watching some highly scripted dance with very predictable sound and motion, but little real communication, creativity or human connection on either side.

But I find that juxtaposition of a school with an abortion clinic, on the same block, deeply symbolic, in a disturbing way. A school is a prime example of a community that is organized and oriented toward the weakest, the neediest, the most vulnerable: children, and their needs. Especially a school like Hope Academy. The abortion clinic, on the other hand, speaks to me of the tragic ways in which those same children might be unwanted, their conception and birth considered a disaster. For that I blame men, as much as mothers, for the very tragedy at the heart of this conflict: that a human life, real or potential, would be unwanted in the first place. The position of these two organizations on the same block to me is a visible parable about our common ambivalence toward weakness and need, including our own. On one hand we want to turn, with compassion, toward those in need. On the other, something tempts us to run from the fist sign of our common human vulnerability. Its what prompted some cities to actually pass laws a century ago that prohibited persons with diseases, deformities or amputations from being present on the streets: the fear of our weakness, our vulnerability and our dependence one upon one another. Its what prompted the question that Cain posed to God, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” The rest of the Bible is God’s answer to that unfortunate question, including, and especially, Paul’s surprising words about the body of Christ.

But ever since Cain tossed that defiant question at the face of God, human societies have tended to orient themselves toward the desires and dictates of the most powerful and privileged members, as we see with warlords like Hitler, Mao or Pol Pot, or when corporate raiders raid company assets and pensions and walk off with more wealth than they know what to do with, while leaving others unemployed, or with the mafia, or in the pre-packaged celebrity people product industry, in which people live vicariously through the escapades of tabloid magazine subjects.

Every human society that is oriented towards the top always and eventually requires sacrificial victims, whether in the womb, or when of the age of military service, or whether they are identifiable by their language, their skin color, their country of origin, or by the documents they don’t carry. Then no one is safe from the possibility of an ever-widening feeding frenzy. Like Pastor Martin Niemoller said, during Hitler’s regime, “When they came for the Communists, I said nothing, because I’m not a Communist; When they came for the labor unions and the Socialists, I said nothing, because I’m not a union member or a Socialist; when they came for the Jews, I said nothing, because I’m not a Jew; and when they came for me, no one said anything, because no one else was left.” As I read I Corinthians, I get the impression that Paul was trying to put a stop to the feeding frenzy that was happening in those churches. It was a feeding frenzy over who was the most spiritually gifted, and who had the most power, honor and liberty among them.

Now we might say, “But wait a minute! Christ is the head of our body, the church, and we give all honor and obedience to him.” Doesn’t that mean we’re oriented toward one supreme leader too? I hope we are. But the head of this body is is the Christ who says, “Whatever you have done for the least of these, my brethren, you have done for me.” Christ identifies himself with the lowest, weakest and neediest parts of our body politic, and is most often to be found by loving and serving them. Whatever we do to honor, serve, cherish and protect them, we do for Jesus.

Today’s passage then speaks of an opposite organizing principle than the one found in most societies, one that’s truer to the human body, and the body of Christ: that no part of the body is dispensable, especially not the weaker parts, and the most care and protection go to the most vulnerable and least presentable parts. That’s the surprise twist that Paul adds to the conventional social body talk of his time. If such an orientation toward the most vulnerable, the weakest and their needs sounds burdensome and unfair, remember that the most vulnerable, weak and needy include ourselves, if not now, then some day. Yes, Paul says that “the body parts should have equal concern for each other.” But that only happens when a group is oriented toward seeing and serving their weakest and most vulnerable members. Otherwise, we drift back into the human default mode of serving, fearing, envying and even worshiping the most powerful and privileged people. Rather than a burden, this new organizing principle is good news for all of us.

We do this already at Emmanuel Mennonite Church in several ways. One is with our policy for preventing abuse and responding if ever, God forbid, there should be even any hint of it. Then there’s our top notch Christian education program and teachers. We also have a deacon’s fund to respond to financial crises and emergencies, or to help people with needs they might not be able to afford, like utilities or counseling. Our denomination and conference, and other church agencies, stand ready to help us deal with the inevitable issues of physical and mental disabilities, and of mental and emotional health needs that we all face. Some day I’d like to see us address the issue of accessibility in this building for those with physical impairments. No one’s knees are getting younger. Remember, whenever we talk about organizing and orienting ourselves toward the needs of the most vulnerable and weak, we’re not talking about “them,” we’re talking about “us” and “ourselves.” That makes us, the Body of Christ, God’s answer to Cain’s question, “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

Categories: Messages

SUSHI TONIGHT! A Story of Interdependence

Posted on June 3, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

Sandra: How far do you think we have moved since the shipwreck?

Oscar: If my dead reckoning is right, we should be drifting into the shipping lanes by tomorrow. Within a day or two of that, someone should see us.

Sandra: You don’t sound too sure.

Oscar: I’m as sure as one can be in these circumstances. I learned to read location by my watch and the sun when I was in the Merchant Marine.

Sandra: I hope you’re right. Its almost a week since the ship went down, and we’re running low on water. And I’d kill for something to eat.

Oscar: Don’t look at me like that when you say that, Ma’m.

Sandra: What are you afraid of? You’re the one with the knife.

Oscar: Don’t worry; I’ve got an idea for food.

Sandra: One that doesn’t involve me, I hope.

Oscar: Yes, but only as my dinner companion, not the menu. Ya know, I’ ain’t been ’round more sophisticated, high society company at dinner time since I bussed tables at the Ritz.

Sandra: I eat there quite often, usually late at night, after the opera.

Oscar: What was your favorite meal?

Sandra: Trout Aumondine.

Oscar: Well tonight, Ma’m, if our luck comes through, we might dine just as elegantly.

Sandra: There are trout in the ocean?

Oscar: No. But we’re drifting toward seaweed and that flock of circling seagulls.

Sandra: Seaweed and seagulls? I’m not that hungry yet.

Oscar: Look where the seagulls are diving. See the splashes in the water? Somethin’s driving baitfish toward the surface. Probably bonita. I seen that all the time off Long Island. When we drift close enough, maybe we can catch us some.

Sandra: With what?

Oscar: The survival kit on our lifeboat come with some fishing line and hooks.

Sandra: Even if you catch some, how are we going to cook them?

Oscar: Ever had sushi?

Sandra: Sure.

Oscar: I’m pretty sure I know how to prepare it, bein’ as I watched the chef at the Ritz do it a few times. Think of it as the chef’s special tonight, provided we catch something.

Sandra: Oh! I just saw some splashes nearby. Quick, get the line in.

Oscar: Just one problem.

Sandra: What?

Oscar: Bare hooks won’t work.

Sandra: Where are we going to get bait?

Oscar: We don’t need live bait. Something shiny and reflective will fool them when they’re in a feeding frenzy.

Sandra: What are you looking at me like that for?

Oscar: Your earrings.

Sandra: Not these, they’re pure silver! And they’re a gift from my favorite uncle. But oh well, they won’t do me any good if I starve to death. Here, take them both.

Oscar: One will do. …Thanks…..Yes, the hook fits through the little hole here nicely. Now down we go.

(Pause)

Sandra: Anything happening yet?

Oscar: I think one hit, but I can’t tell for sure. Blast it! I missed the fish and lost the earring too.

Sandra: No wonder! How can you feel anything? Your hands are thick and calloused, like a brickmason’s.

Oscar: Yeah, well I done that too, back in the day. (Pause) Sorry about your earring, Ma’m.

Sandra: Oh, its just an earring. Let me try, with my other earring for bait. My hands are more sensitive. It goes on the hook like this?

Oscar: That’s right.

Sandra: Down she goes. How many feet?

Oscar: They’re not far down at all.

Sandra: Oh! Got him! He hit like a passing freight train. Now what do I do?

Oscar: Pull him up!

Sandra: How?

Oscar: Here, I’ll help you. We just swing him into the boat like this.

Sandra: He’s beautiful!

Oscar: Just like I thought, a bonita!

Sandra: How do they taste?

Oscar: Its not Trout Aumondine, if that’s what you’re craving. Its a kind of tuna, only small. But soon you’ll be eating fresher sushi than what they serve, even at the Ritz. Congratulations on your catch, Ma’m.

Sandra: Our catch, you mean.

Oscar: So quick, get him off the line and catch us another one, before we drift past the school.

Sandra: I’m trying! How do I stop him from thrashing around so much?

Oscar: Watch out for the teeth. Grab him by the middle, and I’ll get the hook out.

Sandra: I’ve never held a fish before, live or dead.

Oscar: You mean you never been fishin’ before?

Sandra: Where on the Upper East Side of Manhattan would anyone go fishing?

Oscar: Seems like we was both deprived in our childhoods, just in different ways.

Sandra: And like we’ve both been blessed with what the other one needed. Got another one!

Oscar: Way to go! Sushi for both of us tonight!

The End

Categories: Drama

READING THE BIBLE: AN ADVENTURE TOGETHER

Posted on June 3, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

The Bible is not just a book, nor a collection of books, it is an entire world. The more I have studied and tried to share it over the years, the more colorful, engaging, harmonious and fascinating I have found that world to be. Or think of The Bible as a grand old house, in which one finds new details and new connections between the rooms over the years. Every so often some new feature of this world, or this house, opens up a new vista or perspective that is both new and ancient, as we become open, through life and God’s Spirit, to new questions and perspectives. For example, in his book, The Old Testament Roots of Nonviolence,(Wipf and Stock, 2010) Philip Friesen has brought to light the deep structures of the Bible that connect Genesis with the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew’s Gospel, and with “The War of the Lamb” in John’s Revelation. Where many people see superficial contradictions and differences, a life with the Bible reveals deep and surprising connections. It chronicles a long, historic and unfolding discussion among God’s people, and between us and God. In effect, the Word of God comes to us through the people of God, just as the people of God are called into being by the Word of God. But through them and their records, their questions, their laments and celebrations and affirmations and confessions of faith and failure, God speaks and ushers us into his presence.

Our church’s mission statement commits Emmanuel Mennonite Church to “the Bible as the source of God’s revelation to humanity.” That we hold in common with most other Christian churches and denominations. It also commits us to “Anabaptist beliefs as articulated in the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective, the statement Vision: Healing and Hope, and Anabaptist/Mennonite imperatives of discipleship, service, community and peacemaking.” Having Anabaptist/Mennonite beliefs and perspective on the Bible means that we do not read the Bible as though it were a flat book, like the Hennepin County Health Code, such that we can switch the pages at random and it would all mean the same thing. According to the Bible itself, there is a historical progression of God’s revelation that affects our reading and interpretation of it. For example, “the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law” (Galatians 3: 24-25). We see Jesus Christ, the Living Word of God, as the pinnacle of God’s self-revelation, and the key to interpreting the whole of the Bible. He is “the righteous one,” and “the royal son” who prays in the Psalms, the “Son of Man” and “Desire of the Nations” foreseen by the prophets, and “the goal of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes” (Rom. 10:4).

History tells us that the renewal of church life, mission and worship happen in conjunction with a renewal of Bible reading. The Anabaptist Movement and the Protestant Reformation were aided, in part, by the invention of the printing press and the spread of literacy in Europe, which in turn enabled many people to read the Bible for themselves, and in groups. An Anabaptist/Mennonite approach to Bible reading also stresses the importance of reading it together, so that a wider range of Holy Spirit gifts and human experience can be used for mutual edification.

To that end, the deacons and I at Emmanuel Mennonite Church are encouraging the use of a daily Bible reading program that will enable all participants to read through the entire Bible in two years. That pace would require reading two chapters a day, for six days a week. We will intersperse chapters or sections from the Psalms and Proverbs into each week’s schedule. Expect there to be occasional adult Christian education classes on Sundays on books or chapters we will have been reading. One option for families with small children will be a lighter schedule of readings so that all ages can read together and discuss. There will also be a section on our church’s website where we can post reflections and questions about our readings, with links to other helpful resources.

If you already have a program of Bible reading that works for you, with which you prefer to stay, we affirm and congratulate that. Check out the suggested program, but feel free to stay with what you have. If you don’t have such a devotional program already, then consider joining this one. Consider having a partner for reading and discussing the passages too. Or form a reading and discussion group that would meet every so often over coffee, lunch or breakfast.

Watch the bulletins, and this website, beginning June 13, for more information and updates on our two year Bible reading program. We will distribute Bible reading schedules at church, on which you can record the progress of your reading. But the weekly Bible references will also be posted on the website and in each week’s bulletin.

Pastor Mathew Swora

Categories: Bible Reading Program

SO IT IS WITH CHRIST

Posted on June 3, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

I Corinthians 12: 7Now to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given for the common good. 8To one there is given through the Spirit the message of wisdom, to another the message of knowledge by means of the same Spirit, 9to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by that one Spirit, 10to another miraculous powers, to another prophecy, to another distinguishing between spirits, to another speaking in different kinds of tongues, and to still another the interpretation of tongues. 11All these are the work of one and the same Spirit, and he gives them to each one, just as he determines.  12The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body. So it is with Christ. 13For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.

There’s a message in this passage for anyone who has ever felt lonely and isolated. Today’s message is also for anyone who has ever felt like they could use a little bit more loneliness and isolation, a little breathing space from all the pressures of society, family, school or the workplace, to conform to something and someone other than our true selves. In fact, today’s message is for anyone who has ever felt both feelings. Because to be human is to need both space and closeness, to belong and to be oneself, to have to manage both kinds of needs, sometimes at the very same moment. Life is like a community solitaire team: being responsible for ourselves……together.

This delicate dance of belonging and being oneself starts out early, and unfolds as we age. Babies see themselves first in the eyes and faces of their parents. Their unique bodies, brains and souls develop as they mimic the movements, sounds and expressions of people interacting with them, and as people mimic them.

A wonderful book title captures the delicate dance of negotiating the shoals of dependence, independence and interdependence as we grow up. Its entitled: “Get Out of My Life, Mom and Dad!—But First Will You Take Me and Cheryl to the Mall?” Or as one person once put it, “I just need other people to appreciate me for the independent person I really am.”

Today, life in America probably errs on the side of isolation and individualism. The author Robert Putnam summed it up best in the title of his book, Bowling Alone. Yes, people can and really do bowl alone. It chronicles the near death of community forums and opportunities like Parent-Teacher Associations or community block watches. That may be hard to believe in civic-minded Minneapolis, but when Becky and I lived in the Detroit area, a couple living next door to us went to ridiculous lengths to avoid us, to never even acknowledge our existence, even though we had two drop-dead cute daughters whom no one else in their right mind could possibly not want to know and play with. In that relationship, or lack thereof, separation gave way to fear. Is this going to end up like some Alfred Hitchcock movie? Do we need an alarm system? Nothing happened, fortunately. But I hope they changed their ways before they discovered the bitter truth that Yogi Berra, the Baseball Hall of Fame catcher for the Yankees expressed so well, when he said, “If you don’t go to other people’s funerals, they won’t come to yours.”

In keeping with this individualism and isolation, a quick glance through the movie ads of the newspaper, or at the latest new computer games advertised at the bus stops (“Red Dead Redemption?”) shows that the most compelling, best-selling heroic epic stories are those about courageous, principled, solitary, tragically misunderstood heroes at war with a corrupt and cowardly community. Anyone remember the Billy Jack movies? On the other extreme you get stories about villains so inhuman, so sociopathic, so antisocial, without any redeeming features, and so incurably at war with a virtuous, peaceful community, that blowing them away is the only possible relief and resolution. Neither of those extremes strike me as real to life. Lately, the plot lines are about the war between a crazy and corrupt community, and loners and oddballs who are equally as crazy and corrupt, on TV shows like Survivor or The Office.

All these story lines have in common the assumption that there can never be peace in this tragic but unavoidable war between the individual and his or her wider network of relationships. Almost totally lacking in either our language, or increasingly our experience, are relationships between the individual and the community that work to the benefit of both. Gone from many mental radars is even the possibility of a community that maximizes the health and growth of the individual members, and how individual members might grow and become their best by serving other people and relationships—a community. Is there any way to be ourselves and to be in relationship, to develop those talents, gifts and interests that just want to bust out of us, without having to burn our bridges, go it alone, and wind up lonely, isolated and bitter?

Yes. Paul draws our attention to an example of this kind of harmony between the parts and the whole that is literally right beneath our noses. It even includes our noses. Its the human body. In verse 12 of First Corinthians 12, he says: “The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they form one body. So it is with Christ.” For example, the liver can best serve the brain, the heart and the lungs by acting like a liver, and not like a lung. Lungs put oxygen into the bloodstream, and that helps the liver. Oxygenated blood also goes through the liver, but to take out wastes and put in sugar. And that helps every other organ be and do what they’re supposed to do. In our own bodies, then, is God’s picture and promise of a world in which people can also be their true selves by being in harmony, connection and accountability to each other, and in which people can contribute most to a better world by becoming and being their own best selves. In fact, it can’t be any other way than both ways.

That’s is what true unity is: not when we act the same, think the same and are the same. What planet does that happen on? Rather, unity is when all our different gifts and perspectives and experience function together to bless each other and the world. Total agreement on everything is not necessary nor even helpful to that.

That’s how Paul wants his Corinthian disciples to relate to each other: they need each other in order to become all that God means each one of them to be. Paul mentions the different gifts they brought to the Corinthian church: speaking in tongues, interpreting them, prophecy, healing and other miraculous works. I won’t explain or define all of them now, partly because I’m still figuring out what they are. But the principle behind them is clear: We need each other’s gifts in order to best develop and use our own, just as we must best use our own, if they are to work well together with those of others.

If that sounds like an impossible balancing act to manage, well, it is a miracle: the miracle of Christ within us and among us. “So it is with Christ,” Paul says. In saying that, Paul compares the church, with all its different but necessary and interdependent parts to the human body. Then he takes us beneath the skin of the church, the body of Christ, to show us that it is Christ who is expressing himself in the world through a diverse unity, and a united diversity, of people who share one mission, but who bring different tools to it, people who share one vision, but who have different gifts; one Lord, one loyalty, one love, but different roles, perspectives and expressions: just like the human body.

This all began when, “we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink” (that’s our banner verse for the year, again). I take it Paul means our baptism as individual members into the Christian life and the church. So we must respect the unique capacities, backgrounds and identities that each person brings to the church, the body of Christ, in their case, Jewish or Gentile, slave or free. Which was daring to say, because nowhere else in that day and time did Jews and Gentiles, slaves or free people expect to interact and relate in such equal and interdependent ways, than in the churches that Paul was planting.

But why should we be surprised by such miracles? Right from the Creation account of Genesis 1, we meet a God who engages chaos not to create uniformity but harmony, a God who speaks forth a world that is diverse and yet interdependent. Ours is a God who is revealed and glorified by harmony, not conformity, by a cooperative diversity, rather than a monotonous uniformity. A God who works not just through persons, but through partnerships.

That’s why our church growth plan, developed a few years back, begins with spiritual growth—our own personal spiritual growth– but it also includes relational matters like partnership and hospitality. To have the most effect on the world, we must let God have his effect on our selves. To be the most magnetic, compelling and effectual church we can be together, we must surrender ourselves personally, intentionally, daily and constantly to the magnetic, compelling and effectual work of the Holy Spirit on our souls. And yet no one can sustain that stance of surrender and cooperation with God for very long on their own, not without other people to help us, and whom we can help. That means that the knowledge and love of God, the knowledge and love of self, and the knowledge and love of others, are the three parallel rails on which are lives are moving toward the New Jerusalem. If our wheels become disengaged from any one of those three rails, the wheels on the other two rails will grind to a halt, too.

So let’s lay hold of this delightful paradox: that we can only be our true, unique, God-intended selves in relationship and community, and that we can only be in true, God-intended relationship and community by learning to be and to value our true selves and each other. That’s how God made the human body, and the body of Christ—the church– with unique but interdependent parts. That’s also how God made the planet, and even the universe. In such unity and community there is even a picture of God himself, Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Categories: Messages
Next Entries
© 2011 Emmanuel Mennonite Church.
725 E. 25th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
Tel: 651-766-9759. Contact Us.
Designed by Boer and Boer  |  Log In