Emmanuel Mennonite Church
Emmanuel Mennonite Church
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Speakers’ Bureau
      • Mathew Swora
      • Philip Friesen
      • Kim Vu Friesen
      • Virgil Wiebe
      • George Sawyer
    • Our Partners
  • Pastor’s Blog
    • For First Time Visitors
    • Messages
    • Bible Reading Program
    • Peace Pages
    • Drama
    • Current Affairs
    • For What Its Worth
  • Christian Education
    • Pre-School (Ages 2-5)
    • Primary (Grades K-2)
    • Middlers (Grades 3-5)
    • Junior Youth (Grades 6-8)
    • High School (Grades 9-12)
    • Adults
  • Media
    • Sermon Archive
    • 3rd Party Content
    • Favorites
    • Links
  • Events
    • Recent Events
  • Contact Us
RSS
Monthly Archives: April 2010

CHRIST MUST REIGN UNTIL…..

Posted on April 27, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

With thanks to N.T. Wright, George Fox and Walter Wink, whose influences can all be detected in the message below, based on….

I Cor. 15: 21 For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. 24Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For he “has put everything under his feet.” Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.  29Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? 30And as for us, why do we endanger ourselves every hour? 31I die every day—I mean that, brothers—just as surely as I glory over you in Christ Jesus our Lord. 32If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for merely human reasons, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised,
“Let us eat and drink,  for tomorrow we die.” 33Do not be misled: “Bad company corrupts good character.” 34Come back to your senses as you ought, and stop sinning; for there are some who are ignorant of God—I say this to your shame.

Did you just hear the trumpet call to battle in this passage? The summons to war? It was there in Paul’s words in verses 24-26: “Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death.”

Before I call us into ranks and send us out marching to battle, I must first deal with a couple of enticing, intriguing side-tracks and detours in today’s passage, that we may all be wondering about, that may be distracting us from the main message of this passage. One is Paul’s curious words in verse 29: “Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? Does that mean that some early Christians were getting baptized repeatedly, standing in for their deceased friends and relatives? Like the Mormons do, in their temples, with all their genealogy research? Maybe. But this obscure, tangential mention is the only biblical clue to such a practice. Paul doesn’t explain it, he doesn’t even condone it, let alone approve of it, he simply asks, if some of you in the Corinthian church don’t believe in a real flesh-and-blood resurrection, what would be the point of you getting baptized for the dead? Now, that reference alone hardly provides the case for a full-blown, industrial strength assembly line practice of looking up everyone’s ancestors and getting dunked in their names. If somebody was doing that in ancient Corinth, they seem to have stopped it pretty quickly, because there are no other mentions of it anywhere in either the Bible or Church history until you come to the Mormons, starting a hundred and fifty-plus years ago. Faith in the resurrection is the main point of this reference, not the baptisms themselves.

Secondly, if you’re scratching your heads over verse 32, so am I. Paul says, “If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for merely human reasons, what have I gained?” Does that mean that, because of his faith, Paul got thrown into the local coliseum with some hungry wolves, lions or leopards, for the entertainment of the crowds, perhaps along with other prisoners and persecuted people? If so, then this Paul is one very impressive rabbi. Because he obviously survived and lived to tell the tale. Paintings, icons, and movies about St. Paul usually portray him as rather small, bookish and old, maybe also stooped and limping from having been whipped so often and pelted nearly to death with rocks. If he also survived lions, wolves and leopards in the coliseum, perhaps he should be portrayed in movies by famous gladiator actor types, like Charleton Heston or Kirk Douglas. Oops, I’m showing my age. Today, the gladiator figures of Hollywoods’ toga and trident pageants would be Brad Pitt or Russell Crowe.

Much as I’d like to believe that the Apostle Paul, when he wasn’t writing parts of the New Testament, was wrestling lions to the ground in the Coliseum of Ephesus and tying their jaws shut with their tails, there’s more than one problem with that. For one thing, the Acts of the Apostles tells us that Paul spent three years in Ephesus and not once does it so much as hint at anything so important and impressive as Paul bare-handedly taming lions, without even a whip and a chair.

But the story of Paul’s time in Ephesus does include a city-wide anti-Christian riot, because the idol-makers in the Temple of Diana feared for their business if more people became Christian. And the leaders of some of the Jewish synagogues also seemed to have had it in for Paul. Sorry to break it to you, but it seems more likely that Paul is comparing the people who gave him so much grief in Ephesus to wild animals. Like whenever we say, “Its a jungle out there.” They certainly acted like wild animals. Any way, the main point of this word about wild beasts in Ephesus is again the resurrection, Jesus’ resurrection and our resurrection, and the meaning of it in our lives. In Paul’s case, it gave him the courage even to face death daily by wild animals. Uh, wild human animals most likely.

All of these distracting little side-tracks point back to the main point of the passage: the resurrection, and its meaning for us before it happens to us. Remember, the issue Paul is discussing is not simply whether there’s life after death, but what kind of life there is after death, and what that means for us here and now.

Now, death is a very personal matter. I’m talking about facing our own mortality, as well as about facing the deaths of friends, family, and loved ones. Whenever we stand at a graveside and say our last goodbyes to a dear and departing friend or relative, our focus is naturally very powerfully personal. What will become of us with this person gone from our lives? What will become of him or her? Will he or she be present to God in some way, conscious of God and others while awaiting the resurrection of the body and the renewal of all things? Will we meet again? If so, will we know each other the same way we did, until recently? These are the kinds of personal, intimate questions that occupy us as we deal with the reality of death and dying.

Paul’s words speak to those very personal concerns. But he is also putting the whole matter of life, death and resurrection into a much bigger perspective, one that ties us in together, one that even ties us in with all of creation, one that even ties us in with God’s great and grand project of restoration, re-creation and reunion for heaven and earth. Every life, death and life thereafter is therefore a major, vital action in nothing less cosmic, grand and glorious than what, from John’s Revelation at the end of the Bible, we might call, “The War of the Lamb.” That was the phrase that pacifist Quakers often used to describe their faith and their mission in the world, and I find it useful too: a war, but not the kind you fight with guns or swords. Rather, its “The War of the Lamb.”

John’s Revelation, the last book of the Bible, is a war story, about the great cosmic fight between a many-headed dragon and “the lamb that was slain.” To the surprise of all the universe, as a surprising reversal to all the “dominions, authorities and powers” that oppress, exploit and divide us, the lamb wins because he is also, “The King of Kings and Lord of Lords,” because he is also “The Lion of the Tribe of Judah.” He wins not by shedding other people’s blood, but by shedding his own blood to redeem for his God and Father a people of every tribe, tongue and nation. And his soldiers, the redeemed, also win by “the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony; for they did not love their lives so much as to shrink from death,” says Revelation 17:14.

John the Revelator was not the first one to describe Jesus’ mission in terms of a war. When Paul told the Corinthian Christians that, “[Christ] must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet,” he was using military and imperial-type language with which the Corinthian Christians were probably very familiar. Jewish Christians among them would have heard echoes of some of the Psalms, which speak about God putting pagan enemy nations under King David’s feet. “Sit at my right hand,” says Psalm 110, “until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.” But in Jesus’ mouth, and in the writings of Paul, the meaning of that language has been interpreted to say that its not the human enemies of the new Son of David who are to die, but death itself.

And the Gentile Christians would have heard in Paul’s words echoes of Roman imperial propaganda in these words, “He must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.” Corinth was a Roman colony, where people would regularly have heard that Caesar reigns and is putting all enemies under his feet. In addition to hearing it, they could read it on their coins. Even while the emperor reigns, he is expanding and extending his domination, authority and power by means of worldly warfare.

But in this passage, Paul turns that imperial and militaristic language upside down and stands it on its head, when he says that, in this War of the Lamb, the Lamb is not imposing his authority, power and domination over others; he is making war against all authority, power and domination. If that sounds like an attack against the titles, hierarchy and power structures whereby people achieve superiority, domination and exploitation over others, I assure you, it most certainly is. A worldly society of fallen, sinful people may rely on some hierarchy, inequality and superiority of titles and power in order to keep some semblance of order. But in the kingdom of God, Jesus said, it is not so to be. The last shall be first, and the first shall be last; whoever would be greatest among you must be the servant of all; and even “The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.” We carry on this war against “dominion, authorities and powers” by our works and witness of love, service and faith.

What an odd reign this is. What a stranger conquest, when viewed from the perspective of the world. The Anointed King of Israel was anointed not by a high priest, as he should have been, but by a woman who was despised by her own community. His crown: not of gold but of thorns. His throne was a cross among criminals. Whom he conquers, he gives new life and hope, by dying for his enemies rather than killing them; by his conquest their hearts are melted, their spirits converted, and they willingly surrender their arms to him. Victory takes the form of softened hearts, reconciled relationships, and a just peace between former enemies and between the exploiters and the exploited. One by one, the tribes and nations of the world fall before the wounded lamb, as members of these communities repent of their oppressive and divisive tribal idols and acclaim the Crucified One king. When the last human tribe and community has been invaded on those peaceful terms, then there will remain one last bastion of oppression, injustice and domination to break down, the most oppressive, unjust and dominating one of all: death itself. That final victory was assured not by his enemies’ deaths, but by the king’s own death. And by his resurrection. Though the war is not over, death is already as good as dead.

This War of the Lamb, leading inexorably to the death of death itself, is the bigger context in which we live, die, and shall live again. For the resurrection of Jesus is our resurrection as well. We didn’t earn it; he bought it for us. And the Lamb’s way of making war is ours as well. As Paul told the Corinthian Christians in his next letter to them, Chapter 10:4: “Though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world. On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds. We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.” To which I would add, to remind us, “Beginning with ourselves.”

That makes of everyone here, and every saint we have known, living or dead, a soldier and a hero in the peaceful, anti-violent, domination-free War of the Lamb. That means that all our acts of loving and serving and testifying faithfully through life and death are not just tiny, insignificant little things, as pointless and impermanent as footprints in the beach at low tide. They are all major, crucial actions in the cosmic, earth-quaking, eternity-changing, soul-shaping War of the Lamb.

I thought about this last week as Becky and I walked and rode through the streets of Washington, D.C., where there is a monument at every corner. Some of them are huge, taking up entire city blocks, like the Lincoln Memorial or the Holocaust Museum. Others are smaller, like statues or mere plaques. Most of them have to do with war. Even as a pacifist, I honor the bravery and the ideals which these monuments commemorate.

But then I remembered a farmer in the congregation that I pastored in Kansas. Off to the edge of his pasture were three graves, side by side. Whose they were, no one knew, or could tell, because there were no tombstones marking them. You could only see the little mounds they still made in the earth, most visible in the early morning, when the sunrise cast long shadows and the dew still glistened on the grass, especially after the hay had been mowed. Perhaps they were pilgrims on the Santa Fe Trail over a hundred and sixty years ago, for it ran through the other side of that farmer’s field. The wagon tracks were still visible, too.

Though unknown to us, those buried along the trail are known to God. If they were enlisted in The War of the Lamb, then we can say of them, as Paul said to the Corinthians, “in Christ all will be made alive.” Then we will know who they are, and they will know us. As the words of the old revival hymn put it, “We shall know each other better when the mist has rolled away.”And as we contemplate the unique and priceless life that each person is, we will see each other for what we are: eternally living monuments to our own battles and victories of faith, hope and love, living and eternal monuments, fought on our front in The War of the Lamb, monuments that will make the mute stone monuments of Washington, Moscow or Paris look puny by comparison. For as C.S. Lewis said, “There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilizations–these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and exploit–immortal horrors or everlasting splendors.”

That’s the big picture in which Paul wanted his Corinthian friends to think about the Resurrection—that of Jesus, their own, and that of their loved ones as they died and were committed to the hope of a future resurrection, together. More than a reason for the private hope of a personal life beyond death, the resurrection of Jesus is the promise and the down payment, or the first fruit, of a coming restoration, a renewal, a recreation, and a reunion of heaven and earth, at the conclusion of the peace-making, life-giving campaign to which we are called and enlisted today: The War of the Lamb.

Categories: Messages

MORE THOUGHTS FROM VISITING THE VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL

Posted on April 24, 2010 by Mathew Swora
2 comments

Another casualty of the Vietnam war was hope. With major Civil Rights legislation and Great Society programs signed into law by President Johnson, the 1960′s were a heady time of hope for progress toward social justice, equality and opportunity for all. But the hope soon faded, like the last note of a bugle playing taps.  The war, like a cowbird in a robin’s nest, was eating up more and more of our nation’s energies and resources. In his address to the New York chapter of Clergy and Laity Concerned, at the famous Riverside Church, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., drew this parallel between Vietnam and the abortive War on Poverty: “A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor — both black and white — through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam and I watched the program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.” (Read the text of the entire speech, “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence,” at http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html).

In the late ’60′s and early ’70′s, what social investments military budgets did not de-fund, politics and war-driven inflation killed off. Common wisdom says that we tried lifting people out of poverty and poverty, and the poor, proved incorrigible. But its more evident to me that our short-lived social investments died in the fields and forests of Vietnam long before they could bear any fruit. Whenever a nation sends soldiers off to war, it is unavoidably warring against its own citizens, directly, by putting them in harm’s way, and indirectly, by beating our much-needed plowshares into swords and the people’s pruning hooks into spears. Another monument is needed on which to list the names of all the Great Society programs that died in infancy, and all the people who were condemned to remain in, or fall into, poverty by the war. It should be within sight of the Vietnam War Memorial.

The social, spiritual and personal effects of this death of hope could be seen in the 1970′s, aptly called, “The Me Decade.” With trust and idealism dying agonizing deaths under war and the Watergate scandal, with poverty and inflation increasing, what was left but to tend one’s own garden, pursue pleasure, and “tune in, turn on and drop out?”

It was in this setting (1973), while trading in my dying youthful idealism for the mindless pleasures of the Me decade, that I was stopped in my tracks by the Prince of Peace. He affirmed my anti-war and pro-Civil Rights beliefs and even intensified them, putting them on an entirely new footing, other than a secular humanism. My waning idealism he replaced with a loyalty and commitment to the visions of Israel’s prophets. I enlisted in the anti-violent War of the Lamb. That was in the course of “The Jesus Movement,” which rescued many of my generation from either burning out on hedonism, or selling out to “The System.”

Through Christ I entered that “Revolution of Values” that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., urged on us toward the close of his speech on the Vietnam War. Read the following words and consider their import to today: “A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: ‘This way of settling differences is not just.’ This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

Just to the south of the wall with the names of all the war dead is a statue to the women who served in Vietnam. It too is powerful and touching. The woman who had seen me crying, and the youth group she was chaperoning, got to it just ahead of me. By the time I arrived to contemplate it, with tears still fresh on my cheeks, some of these youth were climbing over the statue and joking about it. I may well have done the same at their age. But their chaperone chewed them out, telling them, “Its not that kind of statue [for climbing on], and besides, there are people here grieving the deaths of their family members and friends.” She also apologized to Becky for their conduct.

Technically, I was not grieving the loss of any “family members and friends.” I can’t claim to have known a single person whose name is on that wall. But a walk through the memorial reminded me that the world is such that no one is untouched by, or immune to, the effects of love or hate, life or death, war or peace, anywhere in this world. Bearing the names of all the war dead, each one representing an inter-connected web of still-grieving family members and friends, that long dark scar of a monument reminds us that we are all members of the same human household, with much left yet to mourn, to learn, to do, and to heal.

Categories: Peace Pages

THOUGHTS FROM A VISIT TO THE VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL

Posted on April 23, 2010 by Mathew Swora
1 comment

“Are you all right, Sir?” the woman asked, as she saw me crying. She had more than half a dozen middle-school youth with her in tow.

“I’m okay. Thank you,” I replied.

Becky and I were about half way through the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D.C., one day this week, when tears began streaming down my face. Becky remarked how the long, scar-like depression in the earth that is the monument was deepest at the point where it recorded the most names, in the middle and high point of America’s engagement in that conflict. Like the American death toll itself, the monument starts out shallow and narrow, and deepens before it turns and narrows again, to the tiny end point, where someone indeed had to be the last American to die for a tragic mistake. Something about the shape and color of that dark marble scar in the earth mirrors the wound that the war left in ourselves and our country.

Why was I crying? I wondered. I had never served there. Though I got my regulation Selective Service card, like all my peers (that was before I even knew about Mennonites and conscientious objection), I missed the draft for Vietnam by two years. Nor did I know anyone personally who had served and died there. I have since met veterans of the war, but obviously their names will never be on that monument. War stories are written and recounted by survivors. Yet there came back to me memories of the times that some childhood peer had told me that their brother or their father had died there. I either quickly changed the subject or found someone else to play with. The news was too monstrous for a child to face, let alone respond to adequately. Forty-five years later, I do not remember their names. Maybe it was for persons un-known or forgotten, deliberately perhaps, that the tears came. That also shows how, even with a draft, the war did not touch all of society equally. Then, as now, my scholarly, white collar middle class family and friends had options unavailable to poorer, blue collar folks and people of color. That’s worth lamenting, too.

Though I missed the draft, if anyone had told me, at the ripe age of eight or ten, that I would likely be sent to war in Viet Nam, I may well have believed them. From the nightly news and magazines like Time and Life, we got to know the names of Vietnamese cities like Quang Tri, Danang and Hue because our boys were always defeating the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese there. We were assured that we were winning, that there was “a light at the end of the tunnel,” because the body counts of their dead and missing were always higher than ours. Now we know that those figures were often invented and imaginary. But after so many years of defeating the VC and the North Vietnamese in Quang Tri, Danang and Hue, again and again, practically every other week, you couldn’t help wondering how many more years of victory this war would require, how many more years of victory we could take, and whether you’d survive when it became your turn to also go fight and win there. Had Congress not begun de-funding the war on Nixon’s watch, and had Nixon not begun his process of “Vietnamisation,” (turning the war over to the South Vietnamese, with American weapons and training—basically how the war stated twelve years earlier), I would be much more surprised today that I, too, had not gone to Viet Nam and become a name on that wall. Or someone who came to put those flowers and that card that I saw, in memory of a beloved comrade in arms, just below his name. Maybe it was the lifelong burden of his or her grief, more than forty years later, that started the tears flowing.

My third grade teacher, Mrs. Renkin, told me to expect as much. “Many boys like those in this class have grown up to serve their country, to fight and to die for our freedom,” she told us one day, “like boys I went to school with, who died in places like Anzio, Normandy, or Guadalcanal.” She added, “And when it comes your chance, all you boys should be proud and willing to do the same, like our boys now dying to defend our lives and liberty in Viet Nam.”

“That’s easy for you to say, Mam,” I thought to myself. I knew better to say it out loud though, because I was already convinced that she had it in for boys, and gave girls preferential treatment. I’m not sure that my conduct in her class gave her much reason to change her preferences. But that got me to wondering when and why the willingness to kill and die became the price for life as a male. So who decided, and when, that I was born to be expendable? More than forty years later, I wonder if there was some burden of grief she carried from World War II or Korea.

Now I embrace the expendability of this life for the kingdom of God, and even find freedom in that, but with the promise that, in losing this life, I get an even greater one. And I am much more assured of the worth of God’s kingdom, than I am of the cause we were supposed to be defending in Vietnam. We now know that all three presidents who prosecuted the war (Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon), plus at least one of their Secretaries of Defense (Robert McNamara) knew that the war could not be won. They simply did not want to be the first American president to lose a war, nor did they want their party to be accused of being soft on Communism and “losing Vietnam” the way the Democrats  had been accused of “losing” China in the late 1940′s. As though any other country were ours to lose. So they kept sending in the soldiers, either escalating or de-escalating the deadly assembly line, to stay in power and to postpone the day of reckoning until the next administration came into office. In effect, so many of the names on that dark scar of a wall were there for protecting someone’s political hide.

As that suspicion turned to realization, my generation lost the faith that the previous generation had: that our leaders always leveled with us, like FDR with his fireside chats; that our country always wore the white hat and rode to war only to rescue the innocent and to restore justice; and that, being so virtuous and powerful, we would always prevail over the evil other. That narrative seemed to have fit the previous wars of living memory, according to all the movies starring John Wayne and Audie Murphy. And many of the teachers, Scout masters, sports coaches  and even some pastors and priests from that generation kept reminding us of it. But many of us were beginning to think otherwise, and to feel betrayed. And afraid. You couldn’t tell all your peers or your coaches or teachers about the loss of your faith in the iron-clad innocence and virtue of your country and its leaders, without risking some serious consequences, the least of which was being called “coward” or “traitor.” Families and friendships broke up, jobs were lost, even (we later found) phone lines were tapped, mail was opened and taxes were audited during the Johnson and Nixon administration, if you were prominent, vocal and active enough against the war. Maybe it was that loss of faith and innocence that came back to me in the form of tears.

April 23,

Mathew Swora

Categories: Peace Pages

SOME MORE THOUGHTS ON THE CLERGY ABUSE SCANDAL

Posted on April 7, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

This latest round of clergy sex and cover-up scandal could help usher in the next big thing: a Reformation Point Three. I think Reformation Point Two has been underway already in the globalization of the church and the emergence of the Church of Asia and Africa. We think of Reformations as basically theological movements. But I wonder if they aren’t just as much about power, and the breaking down of mental, institutional and social fortresses, so that the power within can be dispersed, shared,  and multiplied, as it was meant to be. Even the great theological councils and creeds, perhaps even the formation of the Canon, may have happened in part as reactions against the abuse of power, and to establish or affirm external standards of faith and conduct by which to hold leaders and authorities accountable to the people whom they are to serve and empower. Popular imagination holds heretics like Marcion in the 5th Century A.D, who tried to eviscerate the Canon of everything Jewish, as renegade heroes fighting for our freedom to think for ourselves (the prequel to The Da Vinci Code). But their brands of faith required at least as much faith in themselves as orthodoxy requires in its sacred scripts. And that without the stringent moral standards of the scriptures. Or the accountability of other believers, living or dead.

As I talk with unbelievers, one common reason they cite for not believing is not so much the beliefs themselves (they often believe things that require at least as much faith), but the church’s abuse of power, politically and economically, as well as sexually. A Reformation Point Three would recycle some of the original Protestant and Anabaptist criticism of entrenched, hierarchical, institutionalized religious power. It would also take us back to an apostolic understanding of church leadership, as a tool for the maturation and empowerment of all believers, even to the cultivation and multiplication of power and leadership. In the kingdom of God, those are not zero-sum schemes; Holy Spirit-given power and leadership grow with the sharing. And that takes us back to the model of leadership and power exercised by Jesus, who gave himself away to the ultimate degree, so as to share his life, power, mission and authority with his disciples.

In a Reformation Point Three, we will relearn how to minister and witness without the kinds of power and prestige that the church hierarchy was trying to protect with its cover-ups. That kind of power and prestige are going, going…..gone even as I type this. That will lead to new/ancient and more grass-roots forms and shapes of church, operating against social headwinds of mistrust and contempt. Again, nothing new in our history. The setting, in fact, for some of our finest moments.

April 7, 2010

Pastor Mathew Swora

Categories: Current Affairs

WHAT A DIFFERENCE HOPE MAKES

Posted on April 6, 2010 by Mathew Swora
Comments off

I Cor. 15: 1Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. 2By this gospel you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.  3For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. 6After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born.  9For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them—yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me. 11Whether, then, it was I or they, this is what we preach, and this is what you believed.

Two men adrift in a lifeboat for the seventh day at sea are staring at the last cup of water in the jug. The food’s been gone for three days. Their jokes and stories are all used up. The camradery by which they held up each other’s morale is wearing thin. Thirst is making the older of the two men reconsider his previous offer of letting the younger man drink the rest of the water, when he gallantly said, “you would still have so many more years ahead of you, should rescue ever come.” As hunger, thirst and despair take their physical and emotional toll, and as each person retreats into his survivalist, animal self, an observer would start to wonder, if these two are not rescued soon, will they both die natural deaths?

But just before sunset, one of them spots smoke on the horizon. That distracts their attention and delays the inevitable showdown over the last swallow of water. Suddenly, options to dying of thirst, or of one pitching the other overboard, become thinkable and possible. Its amazing the difference that a little bit of hope can make. Then, come nightfall, they can see a light in the distance. “This is our last chance,” the older one says. “Fire off the last flare.” Just after sunrise, they hear a chop-chop-chop sound, and soon they see a helicopter approaching.

“We’re saved!” the younger of the two men yells. And the two men who were about to kill each other over the last teaspoon of water are now hugging each other.

Technically, they’re not saved yet. That will come a few minutes later when the guy descends on the rope and hauls each of them back up into the helicopter. It would be more correct to say that they “are being saved.” And that’s the phrase that Paul uses for the gospel he taught to the Corinthian Christians. “By this gospel,” in verse 2, he says, “you are being saved.”

Like the smoke of that ship on the horizon, or the light in the darkness at sea, the Easter morning rescue of one man from the dominion of death is a hope-giving sign. It serves notice to all us other mortals, that rescue is coming for us as well. And good thing too, because death and the fear of death do all sorts of ugly things to our conduct and our consciences. You would think that with life being so precious, temporary and vulnerable, we would treat it and each other with care. You would think that, since we know we don’t have each other around forever in this shape and way, that we would therefore do all the more to love each other and treat each other accordingly. And some people do. I’m thinking of the hospice nurse I once met whose gracious, gentle way with terminally ill patients inspires me still.

But its at least as true that the impending reality of death also drives people into the most callous and brutal behavior. Some people come away from funerals or hospice centers or even battle fields believing that life is precious, resolved to treat it that way. But just as many come away thinking life is cheap, including their own, and therefore, the only thing to do is to amass as many treasures and pleasures as one can before the whole gig is up, whatever the cost to others, like the two men in that lifeboat, each one ready to kill the other over the last drop of water. I’ve spoken with several survivors of war who tell me that, even now, many years later, its hard to open up and make friends, hard to make lasting, binding commitments like marriage or friendship, hard to care about themselves and others, because they learned not to do that while they were getting bombed out of cities or while trying to stay alive in combat units. It was just too painful to make friends and lose them in battle, or to fall in love and then lose the beloved to a bombing raid. So just withdraw and hide within the safety of your daily duties and distractions. In which case you wonder, Is there life after birth?

Then there are people who embrace death as the biggest economic opportunity of all. Gangs and the peddlers of dope, guns and drugs. Or the biggest, baddest gangs of all, the international arms cartels, the makers and sellers of guns, bombs and bombers, land mines and nuclear weapons, profiting from the fear of death even while causing it.

Why some give in and surrender to death, to embrace it or exploit it or cause it, while others respond by treasuring life all the more and cultivate it, its hard to say. “There but by the grace of God go I.” But I’d go with what Dr. Victor Frankl said, some fifty years ago. He should know, because he spent several years in Death Central: in a Nazi concentration camp. There he saw strong, healthy, vigorous people die surprisingly quickly while some weak and unlikely people survived, or at least survived longer than you’d expect. The difference, he said, depended in part on whether they had some reason to hope for a better future, or whether they chose to cling to some sort of hope.

Paul’s immediate concern, in reminding us of the resurrection, is not as much the death-derived misconduct of the world, but misconduct and false teachings in the church. As we’ll see in future sermons this Easter Season from I Corinthians 15, their conflicts and misconduct come from a memory lapse. They’ve forgotten the gospel. More like, they have denied and down-played the gospel, deliberately. Paul started the letter by reminding them of the cross. Some of them were denying or down-playing that. Now he ends the same letter reminding them of the empty tomb. Some of them were denying or down-playing that, too. With disastrous consequences. Just as the cross makes a moral statement, about how we are to live and relate, so does the empty tomb. Get that right, understand what the resurrection really truly means, and they’ll unplug their conflict from its source of power.

Like that light on the night-time horizon is the resurrection of Jesus. Just when we thought we were abandoned, alone and forgotten by everyone but the Grim Reaper, there appears an approaching rescuer: the Risen Jesus. Because of his faithfulness and power, we are as good as saved. We are being saved, even now, by the hope that gives us reason, power and purpose to amend our lives and to treat life and each other with the love, the grace and the goodness they deserve. With confidence in our Risen Lord we can say that we are saved from a pointless and eternal death. Saved even from a pointless life. Saved from an existence dominated and diminished by the fear of death, or even the worship of death. Or the commerce of death. We still have to deal with death, and with the dehumanizing and distorting fear of death. But as we do so, we can say with Paul that we “are being saved.”

Two hundred years ago, if you had asked a New England Puritan, “Have you been saved?” his or her answer would have been, “I have been saved; I am being saved; and by the grace of God and not my own, I will be saved.” I think of something similar at every memorial service, or every grave side service I have officiated. We are entrusting this loved one to God’s power to save him or her from death and the dissolution of the body. That salvation was already underway as he or she was already saved in this life from from death’s numbing effect on our spirits and consciences. Saved from death’s claims to our worship and our fear. The empty tomb is God’s guarantee that this salvation is accomplished, its taking shape even now in our lives and loves, and it is coming. What a difference such hope makes, now and forever.

Categories: Messages
Previous Entries
© 2011 Emmanuel Mennonite Church.
725 E. 25th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404
Tel: 651-766-9759. Contact Us.
Designed by Boer and Boer  |  Log In